Monday, November 13, 2017

News from NAMS 2017: Postmenopausal bleeding is always a red flag, unless proven benign


Every postmenopausal bleeding mandates a complete and systematic investigation to rule out endometrial malignancy and blind biopsies are no longer the norm, according to a presentation by Steven R. Goldstein, MD, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at New York University School of Medicine, New York City here at the North American Menopause Society (NAMS) 2017 Annual Meeting.

“If you’re postmenopausal and not on hormone therapy or tamoxifen, you shouldn’t be bleeding,” he further added.

American Cancer Society estimates that in year 2017, about 61,380 new cases of endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma will be diagnosed and about 10,920 women will die from these cancers. The average age at diagnosis is 60 and postmenopausal bleeding is the most common presentation in nearly all the cases.

In majority of women who present with postmenopausal bleeding, the cause is atrophic changes of endometrium or vagina, but depending upon other risk factors, 1-14% of these women will harbor a malignancy and it is important not to miss these women.

ACOG advocates endometrial evaluation in any women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), but blind biopsy is no longer sufficient in ruling out uterine malignancy.

Blind biopsy alone could miss the diagnosis of focal lesions in up to 18% of patients
Endosee


Dr Goldstein said, “The standard of care has changed. Now the standard of care corroborates that a negative blind biopsy is not a stopping point. Clinicians can still begin with a blind biopsy, but unless it is malignant or complex atypical hyperplasia, the endometrial evaluation is not complete."

If cancers occupy less than 50% of the surface area of the uterine cavity, it can very much be missed with a blind biopsy.

if cancer occupies less than 50%, of the surface area of the endometrial cavity, the cancer can be missed by a blind biopsy
Endosee

The Evaluation Algorithm


The investigation should ideally begin with transvaginal ultrasonography(TVS), or sonomicroscopy, to determine the thickness of the endometrium. If distinct endometrial echo or lining, less than or equal to 4 mm is visualized, no further endometrial sampling is required. (99.8%- 100% negative predictive value)

But, in many patients it is not possible to see the endometrial lining because of obesity, adenomyosis structural nonalignment or fibroids.  So, if the endometrial thickness is more than 4 mm or the endometrial echo is difficult to visualize, the next logical step is to perform a sonohysterography or hysteroscopy.

By infusing fluid, clinicians can delineate clearly whether the thickening is focal or global throughout the cavity. If the thickness is global, go for a biopsy. If it is focal occupying more than 20-30% of uterine cavity, plan for a biopsy under hysteroscopic guidance.

It’s easy and timesaving to perform office hysteroscopy, with US FDA approved disposable hysteroscope called Endosee (Cooper Surgical). It provides a quick point of care option and does not require sterilization or special storage. Physicians can take a biopsy under direct vision and resolve the dilemma.

If the patient’s first point of contact is not an obgyn but a primary care physician, an internist or physician from some other specialty, they should at least order a TVS, so that by the time the patient is seen by a gynecologist, the initial sonography report is ready.


Follow on Facebook and Twitter

No comments:

Post a Comment