Endometrial scratch is often offered as an adjuvant therapy to improve the IVF success rates, but the results of a large randomized control trial have shown that the “add-on” procedure does not improve the pregnancy or live birth rates. The study results were presented at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) 34th annual conference in Barcelona, Spain by Dr. Sarah Lensen, a researcher from the University of Auckland, New Zealand.
The study involved 1300 women who underwent IVF across 13 fertility centers in 5 countries (New Zealand, UK, Belgium, Sweden and Australia).
It is proposed that causing injury to the endometrial lining invokes an inflammatory response that helps create a favorable environment for the implantation of the embryo. A survey conducted in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK by Lensen and colleagues in 2016 revealed that about 83% of physician offer endometrial scratch to patients before IVF cycles, especially those who have recurrent implantation failure.
Lensen said in a statement at the conference, "Results from earlier studies have suggested a benefit from endometrial scratching in IVF, especially in women with previous implantation failure. However, many of these studies had a high risk of bias in their design or conduct and did not provide strong evidence. There was still uncertainty about the validity of a beneficial effect."
The women in the study group (690) received an endometrial scratch performed by Pipelle cannula between day 3 of the preceding cycle and day 3 of the IVF/embryo transfer cycle, while the control group (674) didn’t receive any such treatment.
In this intent to treat analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate in the endometrial scratch group was 31.4% and in the control group 31.2%; live birth rates were 26.1% in the former and 26.1% in the latter. No difference was seen in rates of biochemical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or multiple pregnancies among both the groups.
The researchers also looked at other side effects of endometrial scratch and found that the median pain score for the procedure was 3.5. Women also suffered from vasovagal attack, excessive pain, and excessive bleeding.
“Our results contradict those of many studies published previously,” said Lensen, “and, although our trial was the largest and most robust study undertaken so far, it can be difficult for one trial to change practice. However, there are other trials underway at the moment, including two large studies from the Netherlands and UK. Nevertheless, even based just on our results, I think clinics should now reconsider offering endometrial scratch as an adjuvant treatment.”
No comments:
Post a Comment