Showing posts with label recurrence rate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recurrence rate. Show all posts

Thursday, April 12, 2018

Could perioperative NSAIDs treatment markedly reduce metastatic breast cancer recurrence?


Perioperative anti-inflammatory treatment could prevent or reduce the risk of secondary spread of breast cancer after the primary resection surgery according to a paper published April 11 in Journal of Science and Translational Medicine.

The study was conducted in mice but could offer an explanation for the resurgence of the tumor after primary surgery in humans too. It has been a long-known fact that after undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy, there is metastatic recurrence elsewhere in the body after a year or two.

The cause of this is long been debated, some researchers taking it as the natural progression of disease while others propose that handling of the tumor during surgery release the cancerous cells in the circulation.

The researchers set up an experimental wound healing mice model who had breast cancer. They did not do any surgery or disturbed the primary tumor. The systemic inflammatory response to wound led to new tumor growth at the distant site, which was kept in check by the tumor-specific T cell response. Probably, the wound healing consumed all the T-cells that previously kept a check on tumor cells.


The researchers gave the mice NSAIDs for wound healing and noted that the growth of secondary metastasis was curbed considerably.

Earlier clinical studies have suggested that perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs reduce early metastatic recurrence in breast cancer patients, but no explanation was put forth for the cause.

A 2012 study particularly showed that breast cancer patients given the anti-inflammatory drug ketorolac during surgery were five times less likely to have their cancer spread than people who didn’t get the painkiller

“This represents the first causative evidence of surgery having this kind of systemic response,” Jordan Krall, the first author of the study and a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's White Head Institute for Biomedical Research, said in a statement announcing the study's publication.

“Surgery is essential for treating a lot of tumors, especially breast cancer," Krall added. "But there are some side effects of surgery, just as there are side effects to any treatment. We’re starting to understand what appears to be one of those potential side effects, and this could lead to supportive treatment alongside surgery that could mitigate some of those effects.”

It’s not yet clear whether any specific NSAIDs will give more benefit than others, or what’s the best dose or timing to deliver the drug.

Professor Robert Weinberg, the new study’s senior author says, “Mice are not people and therefore this may not translate into clinical practice. Our paper is only intended to alert people to this possibility and to explore whether this mechanism operates as well in humans as we think it might.”

Scientist agrees that more research is needed to investigate an explanation as simple as this, as NSAIDs are routinely used in the peri and postoperative period to ease the pain.


Sunday, January 1, 2017

Comparable results achieved with marsupialization vs. Word catheter in Bartholin’s abscess/cyst.

 It is estimated that approximately 2% of women of reproductive age will develop Bartholin cyst/abscess once in their lifetime.[1] Culture results showed causative organisms as E. coli in 43.7% of cases with 37% recurrence in future.[2]

Word Catheter 


A review of literature identified multiple treatments for the condition, but failed to single out any one as the best approach. [3] A recent article by Brazilian researchers published a case series of 31 patients treated with CO2 laser quoted 17% recurrence after the procedure.[4]

The use of Word balloon catheter relieves pain immediately, well accepted and has low recurrence in the future. It is also cost effective in saving precious clinical time, healthcare resources and does not require anesthesia as compared to marsupialization.

Studies comparing the efficacy of both the procedures in terms of recurrence are few and not well designed. A Randomized Control Trial (RCT) by Kroese et al. published in the current issue of BJOG An International Journal Of Obstetrics and Gynecology compares the recurrence rate of both the procedures.

It was a multicentric, open-label, well designed randomized controlled trial conducted at eighteen hospitals in Netherlands and one in England between August 2010 and May 2014.

The study recruited 169 women with Bartholin cyst or abscess and allocated them to either receiving Word catheter (n = 82) or marsupialization (n = 79).

The investigators were primarily interested to study the difference in recurrence rate at the end of year. Other secondary outcomes studied were pain scores, use of analgesics and time to treatment from diagnosis.

Ten women (12%) suffered a recurrence in Word Catheter arm as compared to eight women (10%) in marsupialization arm. (RR) 1.1; P = 0.70. Pain scores were also comparable although patients in Word catheter arm used more analgesic in first 24 hours.

The authors stated “In our opinion, our data therefore favor treatment of a Bartholin cyst or abscess with a Word catheter since this is the fastest procedure, relieving pain sooner after diagnosis, with less cost than when marsupialization is performed.”

The study has several advantages of being generalizable to large population, robust follow-up of 1 year and being adequately powered.

The drawback is diabetes was not included as a confounding factor, which could have affected the recurrence rate in some patients.

  




[1] Lee MY, Dalpiaz A, Schwamp R, Miao Y, Waltzer W, Khan A. Clinical pathology of Bartholin’s glands: a review of the literature. Curr Urol. 2015;8:22–25. doi: 10.1159/000365683.
[2] Kessous R, Aricha-Tamir B, Sheizaf B, Steiner N, Moran-Gilad J, Weintraub AY. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Bartholin gland abscesses. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:794–799. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a5f0de
[3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19445813
[4] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074230#