Showing posts with label Hormone Replacement Therapy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hormone Replacement Therapy. Show all posts

Friday, February 23, 2018

Menopausal HT may help protect against development of age-related stooped posture


A new North American study found that women who are continuous or remote users menopausal hormone therapy have less evident kyphosis in their mid-eighties as compared to never users. The study is published ahead of print on February 16, 2018, in menopausal society journal Menopause.

Age-related hyperkyphosis is exaggerated anterior curvature of the spine is common in men and post-menopausal women and is associated with increased bone loss, degenerative disc diseases, and vertical compression fractures. It causes difficulty in performing activities of daily living and reduces the quality of life.

The Women’s Health Initiative study has also shown that hormone therapy (HT) reduces the odds of vertebral fractures. Based on the same hypothesis, this study also confirmed the protective effect of HT against the development of kyphosis or dowager’s hump.

The significant decline in estrogen levels after menopause results in accelerated bone loss resulting in the compression fracture of the vertebra. After a woman is put on HT, bone loss increases steadily in 3 years and is maintained by continuous use.

The authors of this study looked at data from nearly 10,000, community-dwelling women aged 65 and older from the landmark Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) and followed them for a period of 15 years. This study is a multicentric, observational study started in 1986 and closed after 31 years in September 2017.

Kyphosis was measured by mapping the Cobb angle in lateral radiograph spine and correlated with HT use.

The mean age of study participants was 83.7 ± 3.3 years and a mean Cobb angle of 51.3 ± 14.6°. 

Nearly half of the women reported having never used HRT, while 25% reported using it remotely in past, 17% reported that they used HT intermittently while only 12% reported continuous use.

After accounting for confounders, women who used HT in remote past and continuous users had nearly 3.0° less kyphosis compared with never users. Intermittent use did not confer any protection and the women had the same Cobb angle as never users.

The SOF findings also showed that women who lose more than two inches in height have an increased risk for fracture and early death.

NAMS executive director Dr. JoAnn Pinkerton concluded, “Women who reported the early use of HT were less likely to develop age-related kyphosis, and the protective benefits continued even after stopping HT. This supports a benefit of prescribing HT close to menopause.”


Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Menopausal hormone therapies and the risk of stroke varies with route of administration

Courtesy: menopausemoxie.com
Route of menopausal hormone therapy plays a very important role in increasing or decreasing the risk of stroke in postmenopausal women reports the results of large Danish national historical study. The study was originally  published in June 2017 in Journal Stroke.

Randomized trials have shown an increased risk of stroke and the study was not completed because of higher risk faced by study participants.

This large epidemiological study included nearly all women aged 51 to 70 years living in Denmark and the cohort was recruited by linking 5 Danish registries, that provided data about hormone therapy exposure and stroke diagnoses (ischemic/hemorrhagic/subarachnoid hemorrhage).

Of, nearly a million women included in the study, 36% used hormone therapy. 2% women (20 199) suffered a stroke.

Current users of hormones were 16 % at increased risk of stroke as compared to never users (RR) 1.16 (95% CI 1.12–1.22), but the risk of hemorrhagic stroke decreased RR: 0.80 (95% CI, 0.70–0.91).

Users of oral continuous, cyclic combined estrogen/progestin, and estrogen only were at 29%, 11% and 18% more at risk respectively for all strokes as compared to never users. The increased risk was because of ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke.

Transdermal HT is safer and does not lead to increased risk of stroke. Unopposed transdermal estrogen therapy had a protective effect, it decreases the risk by 18% (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69-0.98).
Vaginal HT was also protective and decreased the risk of stroke by 35% (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.59-0.70).

Tibolone use increased the stroke risk by nearly 30%, including haemorrhagic.

The authors concluded that, “we found an increased risk of stroke, based on ischemic stroke, with oral hormone therapies that was comparable to findings from randomized studies. We found no risk of stroke with transdermal application and a reduced risk with vaginal estrogen.”


Friday, September 23, 2016

New International Menopause Society (IMS) guidelines affirms the safety of menopausal HT.

The International Menopause Society (IMS) recently released 2016 Global Consensus Statement on Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT).[1]  The IMS brought together 7 international societies, including European Menopause and Andropause Society and the North American Menopause Society to formulate comprehensive, evidence based guidelines with practice essentials to help and guide physicians across the globe in managing women through menopause transition and beyond.

The guidelines are aimed at helping women across the globe to prevent chronic diseases due to aging along with treatment of troublesome menopausal symptoms. 

The term Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT) includes estrogen, progesterone and combined therapies.

The recommendations simply provide an overview of basic principles of hormone therapy which can be modified and adapted according to the geographical region, country specific belief and practices, basic infrastructure of healthcare and the variation and availability of the hormones. It also simply provides consensus and is not a replacement for the detailed guidelines issued by each individual societies.

Professor Rod Baber, IMS President, commented “I believe the new Global Consensus is a major step forward in the management of menopausal women as it provides women and their doctors with internationally endorsed guidance”.[2]

General principles that governs the use of MHT


The option of starting MHT should be decided according to the need of each patient depending upon age, time elapsed since menopause, the symptoms, risk of VTE, breast and gynecological malignancies and CVD.

It should be a part of overall life style change and management including diet, exercise and smoking cessation for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

MHT include a range of hormonal products that can be administered by various routes. It includes Tibolone or CE/BZA too when available. Each product has its own side effects, and risk/benefit rations.

MHT should always begin with the lowest possible dose that alleviates the symptoms with minimum side effects. The route of administration should be tailored to individual need, preference and side effects. 

The benefit/risk ratio should be assessed annually for each patient. The duration of the treatment should be planned accordingly with the lowest possible dose schedule. Some women may require longer duration of treatment for relief of Vaso Motor symptoms (VMS).

Use of estrogen as single systemic agent is only advocated in case of patients who have undergone hysterectomy, concomitant use of progesterone is always advocated with intact uterus unless CE is combined with BZA for uterine protection. 

Testosterone only therapy or in combination with MHT is only indicated in selective postmenopausal women with sexual interest/arousal disorder.

Use of custom compound hormone therapy is not recommended because of batch to batch variability, lack of regulation standards for safety, efficacy and purity.  

Safety data on use of MHT for breast cancer survivor is limited currently. It’s use in such patients can only be undertaken after discussing it with patient’s oncologist when complementary options have exhausted.   

Benefit/risk profile for MHT


Quality of life, sexual satisfaction, mood changes, joint pain and sleep disturbances may improve with MHT.

MHT with Tibolone and combination of Conjugated Equine estrogen and bazedoxifene (CE/BZA) is effective in treatment of osteoporosis. It has consistently seen to be effective in reducing the risk of vertebral, hip and other osteoporosis-related fractures in post-menopausal women.

MHT is the only therapy that is effective in preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with mean T-score in normal or osteopenic range. It should be initiated before the age of 60 or 10 years within menopause for at risk women for osteoporosis. 

If started after the age of 60 years, it is considered the second line of therapy and risk/ benefit ratio should be compared with other first line drugs.

The most effective treatment of VMS at any age is Tibolone and combination of Conjugated Equine estrogen and bazedoxifene (CE/BZA). Symptomatic women derive maximum benefits if treatment is started within 10 years of menopause or before the age of 60 years.

Vulvovaginal atrophy(VVA) is now considered a component of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). MHT including Tibolone relieves the symptoms of VVA. Topical estrogen preparations are first line of treatment in patients with only local vaginal dryness, dyspareunia or recurrent UTI. Ospemifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) is also licensed in some countries for treatment of dyspareunia due to VVA.

Many observational studies, RCTs and meta-analysis provides data that shows consistent benefits in standard dose estrogen alone group as compared to estrogen plus progestogen MHT in decreasing myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality when initiated before age of 60 or within 10 years of menopause.

The risk of VTE and ischemic stroke increases with oral MHT as compared with transdermal therapy (0.05 mg twice weekly or lower) when started before the age of 60 years.

The risk of breast cancer with MHT in women over the age of 50 years is a complex issue. Estrogen only MHT in women with hysterectomy shows a lower risk as compared to combine therapy the medroxyprogesterone acetate in the women’s health initiative study (WHI). However, the risk of < 1.0 per 1000 women per year is less than that associated with sedentary life style, alcohol consumption and obesity.

Women who experience a natural or iatrogenic menopause before the age of 45, particularly before the age of 40 face a consistent high risk for cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, mood disorders and dementia. Results of observational studies have shown that these women benefit from MHT, but they have to be confirmed by RCTs. MHT can be prescribed till the age of natural menopause. 

In women with major depressive disorders, antidepressant therapy remains the first line of treatment, although MHT can be used to improve mood in women with anxiety/depressive symptoms.  MHT initiated in early menopause and after the age of 65 years also does not have significant effect on cognition and increase the risk of dementia.  Although some observational studies have shown that early initiation may prevent Alzheimer’s disease in later life.




[1] http://www.imsociety.org/manage/images/pdf/fd28270c02bdca95a58a471e1719e9b4.pdf
[2] http://www.imsociety.org/manage/images/pdf/d9cfd8c2b902d63b0c1bb0ada805240d.pdf

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Hormone replacement, Insulin sensitivity and Diabetes: Is there a critical window of opportunity?



This article is based on a commentary Dr JoAnn Manson, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital and   a recent paper published in Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism by Pereira R et al which concluded that there certainly is a time period in postmenopausal women when giving estrogen would alter the development of Insulin resistance and subsequent T2DM.

Pereira and colleague conducted a very small and short term RCT consisting of 46 postmenopausal women. Half of the subjects were less than 6 years into menopause and the other half were older and nearly 10 years past menopause.

All these women were given transdermal estradiol in high dose of 150 µg/day for a week.

After that they were given Glucose disposal rate ( GDR)  test which measures the rate of glucose uptake from the blood by the peripheral tissues, such as skeletal muscle with a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.

There is no apparent time dependent decline in GDR with age or menopausal status per se. But, it was seen that after estrogen therapy  in younger women with less than 6 years into  menopause, a improvement in GDR and insulin sensitivity was observed , whereas those women who are older and further down the lane from menopause there was deterioration in GDR test and decrease in insulin sensitivity.

In the past there are several Randomized Control trials studying the effect of hormone therapy on diabetes in menopausal women. The data from the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS), in which 2763 postmenopausal women with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) were randomly assigned to daily estrogen plus progestin therapy or to placebo showed that those assigned to hormone therapy had a 35% lower risk of diabetes.

Similarly two trials from the Women’s Health initiative also showed benefits, although the effect was smaller when using estrogen and progesterone as when using estrogen alone.

Now does that mean that HRT should be solely started to prevent the happening of diabetes? No, because HRT is associated with its own risks of venous embolism and stroke.

The study simply gives us one more reason to be optimistic and instrumental in starting HRT in those recently postmenopausal women who have other indications for hormone therapy, such as hot flashes and other symptoms where hormone therapy would be indicated. The study also points to important metabolic benefits of hormone therapy that should be studied in greater details with much larger trials. 


References:

Pereira RI, Casey BA, Swibas TA, et al. Timing of estradiol treatment after menopause may determine benefit or harm to insulin action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:4456-4462. Abstract

Margolis KL, Bonds DE, Rodabough RJ, et al.; for the Women's Health Initiative investigators. Effect of oestrogen plus progestin on the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative hormone trial. Diabetologia. 2004;47:1175-1187. Abstract

Kanaya AM, Herrington D, Vittinghoff E, et al.; for the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study investigators. Glycemic effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:1-9.


http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/30/5/1143.full