courtesy: wn.com |
Microscopic hematuria
detected during urine analysis without any symptoms is an important clinical
indicator of malignancy. Over the years, the definitions of microscopic hematuria
have changed, but the data was primarily based on studies done on male
patients.
The American
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists(ACOG) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUS)
has updated its guidelines for low risk women presenting with microscopic
hematuria.
The
committee opinion was published online on March 30, 2017 ahead of print in
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Sex specific
guidelines for microscopic hematuria were not available till now, although the differential diagnosis of microscopic hematuria varies considerably according
to the sex of the patient.
Risk of
urinary tract malignancies are considerably less in females.
In women older
than 60 years, gross hematuria with a history of smoking is a strong predictor
of urologic malignancy.
In women
younger than 50 years, not presenting with gross hematuria with no history of
smoking and fewer than 25 red blood cells per high-power field on microscopic urine
examination the risk of urinary tract malignancy is less than .5%.
Evaluation
of such patients is not cost effective and may result in more harm than
benefit. Hence, the data supports changing the guidelines in low risk groups.
ACOG and AUS
has recommended the organization formulating guidelines to analyze sex specific
data and formulate sex specific guidelines.
In the
meantime, ACOG and AUS recommend that women between 35-50 years of age, who do not
have any symptoms or a history of smoking should undergo evaluation only if
they have more than 25 red blood cells per high-power field.
No comments:
Post a Comment