Monday, December 7, 2015

Is routine cystoscopy to detect urinary tract injuries at gynecologic surgery feasible ?



Teeluckdharry et al. - Urinary Tract Injury at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and the Role of Cystoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Obstetrics & Gynecology, December 2015

This is a recent review and meta-analysis on role of routine use of cystoscopy in benign gynecological surgeries

Why this topic is important?

Injuries to the urinary tract, even if they occur relatively infrequently, can cause significant morbidity. Thus, intraoperative detection and recognition of urinary tract injuries remain very important for patients and gynecologists because they decrease morbidity and result in less litigation. Up to 75% of ureteric injuries are caused by gynecologic surgery and interestingly, most injuries occur during procedures for benign diseases.

What is the aim of the study?

The study aims to derive the rate of routine urinary tract injuries during benign gynecological surgeries and does routine use cystoscopy is a safeguard against them.

The subjects and the study design.

It is a Systematic review with pooled data from 79 studies between January 2004 to August 2014.


Interesting table in the study:

source:http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2015/12000/Urinary_Tract_Injury_at_Benign_Gynecologic_Surgery.7.aspx


Main outcome results:

The study got an adjusted ureteric injury rate of 0.3% and a bladder injury rate of 0.8%. The estimated postoperative ureteric injury detection rates per 1,000 surgeries were 1.6 without routine cystoscopy and 0.7 with routine cystoscopy. Postoperative bladder injury detection rates per 1,000 surgeries were 0.8 without routine cystoscopy and 1.0 with routine cystoscopy.
The study found that the proportion of ureteric and bladder injuries detected intraoperatively without routine cystoscopy is approximately 18% and 79%, respectively. However, when cystoscopy is performed, the proportion of ureteric or bladder injuries detected intraoperatively increases to approximately 95%.

What were the study strengths and weaknesses?
The study combines pooled data from a total of 79 studies but the the majority of studies were retrospective  which lowers postoperative injury detection rates.
What are the “practice essentials” learned from the study?
The study concludes that until more evidence is accumulated, the clinicians should learn the skills and maintain a low threshold for performing cystoscopy selectively in any cases in which there is suspicion of ureteric or bladder injury.

References:





2 comments:

  1. Just read your website. Good one. I liked it. Keep going. you are a best writer your site is very useful and informative thanks for sharing!
    Fibroids Natural Treatment in Bangalore | 3D Laparoscopic Surgery in Bangalore | Cystoscopy Hospital in Bangalore

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was a useful post and I think it's fairly easy to see in the other reviews, so this post is well written and useful. Keep up the good work.Fibroids Natural Treatment in Bangalore | Best Hospital in Bangalore for Laparoscopy | Fibroids Treatment in Bangalore | Gynaecology Clinic in Bangalore |

    ReplyDelete