Showing posts with label prevention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prevention. Show all posts

Friday, October 20, 2017

Consuming the right amount of Calcium is key to prevent postmenopausal osteoporosis: EMAS guidelines

Courtesy: Washington post 

Intake of right amount of Calcium, preferably from dietary source is the key to manage bone health in postmenopausal women and anything in excessive may not help, and can be harmful, says the new European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) clinical guidelines published in forthcoming issue of Maturitas.

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is rife throughout the world and despite recommendations about diet and lifestyle changes from societies and governmental bodies, many issues remain unresolved. Calcium is drug which is often consumed as either single supplement or in combination with Vitamin D3 and self-dosing is very common.

Different societies have recommended different doses ranging from 700 and 1200 mg/daily and uncertainties prevail about the most appropriate dose.

Excessive intake of calcium beyond 2000mg/day is linked to increases risk cardiovascular events, dementia, urolithiasis and even fractures, but the issue remains unresolved.

To develop the current EMAS guidelines the authors looked at systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials from 2007 till present.

The key recommendations by EMAS are:


The guidelines reiterate the role of adequate intake of calcium in preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis and fracture risk.

The recommended calcium intake should be between 700 and 1200 mg per day after menopause.

Diet should be the preferred method for sourcing the daily requirements, as the intake is uniformly distributed throughout day and avoids the calcium peaks in blood.

Higher than recommended amount is not useful, on the contrary it may do possible harm.

If women are not able to take supplements and the diet also does not supply the recommended amount of calcium, they should have regular physical exercise and take Vitamin D to maintain healthy bones.

The EMAS recommendation of 700 to 1200 mg per day differ from US guidelines in terms of daily dosage. The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) and the American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC) the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) Food and Nutrition Board, and the North American Menopause Society(NAMS) recommends 1200 mg of elemental calcium per day.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommended 1500 mg of elemental calcium per day.

But, the study authors opined that the 300-mg difference between European and US guidelines does not matter much as the real problem starts if the daily intake exceeds 2000 mg or more.

The EMAS recommendations does not apply to women receiving antiosteoporotic drugs, which require concomitant supplementation with calcium and vitamin D. 

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

A good night sleep makes you feel like winning a lottery worth $ 250000.


Getting the right amount and good quality  sleep is as beneficial to health and happiness as winning the lottery, according to research by the University of Warwick. The paper was published in March issue of Sleep Journal to mark  World Sleep Day on March 17, 2017. [1]

Lack of enough sleep has already been recognized as a major public health problem and has been linked to many chronic health diseases like hypertension, diabetes, depression, and obesity, as well as from cancer, increased mortality, and reduced quality of life and productivity.


CDC recommends that adults between the age of 18-60 years need a minimum of 7 or more hours of good quality sleep. [2]

Dr. Nicole Tang in the Department of Psychology at the University of Warwick in England, analyzed sleep patterns of more than 30,594 people in the United Kingdom for a period of 4 years.

The study assessed three key patterns of interests, sleep quantity, sleep quality, use of sleep medication. The outcome of interests were general health and well-being which were measured by General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12; Likert scoring)  and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12).

About 77% participants reported an average sleep duration of 6–8 hours per night, nearly 80% reported good sleep quality while 16% took sleep medication at-least 3 times a week.

After adjusting for baseline variations and known confounders it was seen that good night sleep is associated with benefits in health and well-being, with quality of sleep is more important than quantity of sleep. Physical benefits of sleep take longer time to occur than mental well-being. Sleep is a multi-dimensional experience where the quality also matters along with the quantity.

“The current findings suggest that a positive change in sleep is linked to better physical and mental well-being further down the line,” said Dr Tang.

“It is refreshing to see the healing potential of sleep outside of clinical trial settings, as this goes to show that the benefits of better sleep are accessible to everyone and not reserved for those with extremely bad sleep requiring intensive treatments.

Association between sleep deprivation and medical errors like clinical performance deficit, and daytime fatigue are well established by earlier studies. It has also been linked to many vehicular accidents, industrial disasters and other work related errors.

Taking sleep medication is worse for health and these group of patients performed worse over course of years than those not requiring sleeping aides.  

An estimated 50-70 million US adults have sleep or wakefulness disorder and Questions about sleep are seldom asked by physicians.

Sleep has recently emerged as a feasible target for applying preventive measure to improve health of public. 

The full text of article  can be accessed here.




[1] https://worldsleepday.org/
[2] https://www.cdc.gov/sleep/about_sleep/how_much_sleep.html

Friday, January 20, 2017

ACOG supports the USPSTF’s broader list of risk factors for supplementing low dose aspirin in preeclampsia risk reduction.


low dose aspirin 


The current ACOG recommendation for supplementing low dose aspirin for reducing the risk of developing preeclampsia is based on report by Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy in 2013.

The task force recommended 60-80 mg of aspirin started late first trimester for all women who are at risk by their obstetric history:
  • history of preeclampsia in more than one prior pregnancy.
  • history of early onset preeclampsia with preterm delivery at <34 weeks' gestation.

The U.S.Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of several good quality RCTs and published the results as clinical guidelines. It expanded its list of high risk pregnancies at risk for developing preeclampsia in 2014.[1]  The list was divided into 3 categories: high, medium and low risk for developing preeclampsia.

1) Women are considered at high risk if one or more of the following factors are present:

  • History of preeclampsia, especially when accompanied by an adverse outcome
  • Multifetal gestation
  • Chronic hypertension
  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes
  • Renal disease
  • Autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematous, antiphospholipid syndrome.

2) Women are considered at moderate risk if they have several of these moderate-risk factors:
  • Nulliparity
  • Obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2)
  • Family history of preeclampsia (mother or sister)
  • Sociodemographic characteristics (African American race, low socioeconomic status)
  • Age ≥35 years
  • Personal history factors (e.g., low birthweight or small for gestational age, previous adverse pregnancy outcome, >10-year pregnancy interval)

3) Women are considered at low risk if they have:
  • A history of uneventful term delivery.

ACOG issued a practice advisory in July 2016[2] supporting  the recommendation by USPSTF to consider the use of low-dose aspirin (81 mg/day), initiated between 12 and 28 weeks of gestation, for the prevention of preeclampsia, and recommends using the high-risk factors as recommended by the USPSTF and listed above.

Supplementing the low dose aspirin reduced the reduced the risk for preeclampsia by 24% in clinical trials and reduced the risk for preterm birth by 14% and IUGR by 20%.

In a meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies, USPSTF did found any evidence of increased risk of placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, or fetal intracranial bleeding even in moderate to low risk patients.

It is estimated that ten million women develop preeclampsia each year around the world, with 76,000 deaths due preeclampsia and related hypertensive disorders.  It is also responsible for 50,000 stillbirths and early neonatal deaths in developing nations.

A woman in developing country is seven times more likely to develop preeclampsia than a woman in a developed country, contributing to 10-25% of all Maternal mortality.

In the United States, it affects 5-8% of all pregnancies.

Establishing casualty, early detection and prevention of preeclampsia along with identifying the women at risk has been the mainstay of preeclampsia research in the last decade.

Link to USPSTF complete final recommendation  can be found here. 
Link to ACOG practice advisory can be found here
  



[1] https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/low-dose-aspirin-use-for-the-prevention-of-morbidity-and-mortality-from-preeclampsia-preventive-medication
[2] http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Practice-Advisories/Practice-Advisory-Low-Dose-Aspirin-and-Prevention-of-Preeclampsia-Updated-Recommendations

Friday, May 27, 2016

ASCO issues evidence based, global guidelines for managing invasive cervical cancer.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has issued recommendation on managing invasive cervical cancer.  There exist wide disparities in screening, diagnosing and treatment of patient diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer across the globe. Economic disparity and lack of resources make it impossible to adopt the same guidelines universally. 

ASCO has first time published ‘resource stratified’ guidelines that are tailored according to the resources available in a specific region.

The guidelines were published online before print on May 25, 2016, in Journal of Global Oncology.

According to WHO statistics, an estimated one million-plus women worldwide are currently living with cervical cancer of which about 84 per cent occur in less developed countries.

Dr. Linus Chuang, MD, MS, professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive science at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, who is cochair of the ASCO expert panel that developed the guideline said "In those regions, access to pathology services, skilled surgeons, radiation machines, brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and palliative care may all be constrained." 

Dr. Jonathan S. Berek, MD, MMS, professor and chair of obstetrics, gynecology, and gynecologic oncology at the Stanford University School of Medicine in California, and who is also cochair of the ASCO expert panel opined that At least two-thirds of the women who die from cervical cancer have not had regular screening, "If we improved screening and HPV vaccination around the world, we might be able to substantially decrease the mortality from cervical cancer." 

ASCO called upon a multidisciplinary, multinational panel of cancer specialist, medical and radiation oncology, health economic, obstetric and gynecologic, and palliative care experts to develop   guidelines that encompasses resource tiered settings.  A systemic review of literature from the year 1966 to 2015 could not yield sufficiently strong evidence to develop tailored guidelines across the different region globally, so a formal strategy of developing consensus based guidelines was adopted.

Five sets of guidelines from different bodies and societies were reviewed in current context and recommendations were formed into 4 tier that is basic, limited, enhanced, and maximal. For surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment combinations and modalities available were formed according to the 4 tier.

  1. Surgery: In basic tier Simple (extrafascial) hysterectomy or more extensive hysterectomy can be performed while in maximal  tier facilities Radical hysterectomy, radical trachelectomy, pelvic and paraaortic LN sampling, sentinel node biopsy, and pelvic exenteration; radiation therapy, chemotherapy, interventional radiology, palliative care service, and bevacizumab are all available.
  2. Chemotherapy:  In basic tier availability of chemotherapy drugs were unpredictable, while in maximal capacity Chemotherapy available; bevacizumab is also available.
  3. Radiotherapy: In basic tier no radiation therapy available while RT including external beam and brachytherapy and interventional radiology available in maximal capacity.


The societies were the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in the United States, and the World Health Organization (WHO), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) in Canada, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO).

Workup, Optimal therapy, follow up and post treatment surveillance and palliative care were earmarked for each of these tiers and stage of cancer.

ASCO emphasized that health care providers and health care administrators should be guided by the recommendations from the highest stratum of resource available to provide women with the best evidence based treatment modality and palliative care.

Some of the key recommendations in treatment for invasive cervical cancer are:

  • In Basic setting where radio therapy is not available, extrafascial hysterectomy, either alone or after chemotherapy, can be an option for women with stage IA1 to IVA cervical cancer.
  •  In Enhanced and Maximal settings, concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the standard of care for women with stage IB to IVA disease.
  • Adding  Low dose chemotherapy to Radiotherapy is  ideal, but if chemotherapy is not available the radiotherapy should not be delayed for it.
  • In limited resource settings where brachytherapy is not available, extrafascial hysterectomy or its modification in patients who still have residual tumor of 2-3 months after concurrent radio and chemotherapy.
  • Those patients with stage IV or recurrent cervical cancer in basic settings can be treated with single agent chemotherapy using carboplatin or cisplatin.
  • In patients who have disseminated disease and cannot be cured should be given palliative radiotherapy to relieve pain and bleeding.
  • In areas with very poor resources, multiple short courses of radiotherapy can be used for retreatment of recurrent or residual diseases.
  • In settings where good follow up care can be provided, cone biopsy in basic resources settings and cone biopsy and lymphadenectomy in limited resource setting is the treatment of choice for 1A2 disease. 
  • For patients in enhanced and maximal settings, to preserve the fertility in reproductive age group of women radical trachelectomy is recommended for those with stage IB1 disease with tumor size up to 2 cm.
  • ASCO also noted that the current guidelines are intended to complement the existing guidelines and not necessary replace it.
  • ASCO also provided future directions and stressed the need for prospective comparative research. Radical versus simple hysterectomy (the feasibility and safety of performing cone biopsy or simple hysterectomy) is an active area of investigation in limited resource settings, with stage IA2 versus 1B1 disease.


References:
http://jgo.ascopubs.org/content/early/2016/05/21/JGO.2016.003954.full