Showing posts with label fracture risk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fracture risk. Show all posts

Thursday, October 12, 2017

News from NAMS 2017: “Bisphosphonate drug holiday” not mandatory



A presentation at the North American Menopause Society (NAMS) Annual Meeting in Philadelphia October 11-14, will  present new evidence regarding long term safety and effectiveness of Bisphosphonates and denosumab in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.

According to International Osteoporosis Foundation, Osteoporosis is estimated to affect 200 million women worldwide - approximately one-tenth of women aged 60, one-fifth of women aged 70, two-fifths of women aged 80 and two-thirds of women aged 90.

Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the most commonly prescribed treatments for osteoporosis. There is no cure for osteoporosis and the effects of these drugs wear-off as treatment ceases, hence prevention is the best bet.

As Bisphosphonates therapy is started, protection from osteoporosis is gained in first few months and persists as long as treatment is continued.

If Bisphosphonate treatment is continued beyond 3 years, increasing risk of unusual or “atypical” fractures of the femur (thigh bone) is observed. The risk increases gradually as patient continue to take the drug beyond 3 years: the risk is 20/100,000 patients at 5 years and 1/1,000 patients at 8-10 years.

If the drug is stopped, protection from fractures is lost gradually in 3-5 years.

This combination of increased risk of atypical fractures on continued treatment and decline in protection from fractures as treatment is stopped led to the confusing concept of a “bisphosphonate holiday.”

The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) has recently provided clear recommendations about “bisphosphonate holidays.”

ASBMR recommends that, after 3-5 years of treatment with bisphosphonates, a patient risk of fracture should be evaluated. If the patient remains at ‘high risk’ for fracture because of low BMD, previous history of hip, spine, or multiple other fractures, the treatment should not be stopped.

Patient can continue the same treatment or change to some other drugs like denosumab.

Those patients who are at ‘low risk’ for fracture, the treatment can be stopped for 3-4 years, but it is not mandatory.

The concept of ‘drug holiday’ only holds good for Bisphosphonates only, and not for other drugs like raloxifene, teriparatide, and denosumab because beneficial effects of these drugs are lost as soon as they are stopped.

Dr. Michael McClung of the Oregon Osteoporosis Center in Portland, Oregon, who will be presenting his recommendations on long-term osteoporosis therapy at the NAMS Annual Meeting said, “Because protection from fractures disappears quickly if denosumab treatment is stopped, and since there are no currently known safety issues that limit the duration of denosumab therapy, there is no justification for a drug holiday with this treatment.”

“Just as we do not recommend stopping treatment for high blood pressure or diabetes, it is necessary to have a long-term treatment plan for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis if the benefits of our therapies are to be realized,” he further added.

Dr. JoAnn Pinkerton, NAMS executive director said, “Prevention of osteoporosis should be a goal for those treating menopausal women, as up to 20% of bone loss occurs within the first five years of menopause. Once diagnosed with osteoporosis, the goal becomes lowering the risk of fractures as fractures can be life changing or life limiting. This presentation will offer valuable insights about the need for long-term treatment and will change the way health care providers approach long-term osteoporosis management.”


Friday, October 6, 2017

Easing the menopause transition by latest technology- upcoming North American Menopause Society (NAMS) 2017 Annual Meeting.


The upcoming NAMS 2017 annual meeting that will be held at Philadelphia October 11-14 is sure to be an academic feast. The scientific session will bring in all the latest and comprehensive updates from world renowned speakers with focus on the technological advances that can help women in seemingly smooth transition through the menopausal years.

The meeting is going to kick start with a pre-meeting symposium about Musculoskeletal Health in Postmenopausal Women: Assessment and Management of Fracture Risk by Co-Chair, Michael R. McClung, MD.  This symposium will cover assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis; including dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry(DXA) best practices and new imaging modalities. It will also cover the new pharmacological therapies for osteoporosis and ways to improve the muscle functions.

This will be followed by President’s Reception and other CME activities. The topics that are expected to be covered include: Vaginal Health and Pelvic Pain, Hormone Therapy, Uterine Bleeding and Adnexal Masses, Lesbian Health and Sexuality, Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, Migraines and Mood Disorders in Midlife Women, Advances in Breast Imaging, Musculoskeletal Health Concerns, Social Media and Technology: Driving the Direction of Women’s Health and Update on MsFLASH Trials.

The NAMS updated position statement on Hormone therapy will be presented by JoAnn Pinkerton, MD, from the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, who is executive director of NAMS.
The findings of WHI follow -up study published in JAMA, played a key role in supporting some of the recommendations.

Technological advances, especially mobile health technology and its role in improving patient’s engagement and health will also be focused upon.

In all, the meeting will engage a diverse, multiracial, multiethnic and multispecialty group of people with varied interests, but there will be something for everyone.

Looking forward seeing latest updates and good clinical research abstracts from the meeting.

Related Links




Thursday, September 28, 2017

USPSTF issues draft recommendations on low-dose vitamin D and calcium for fracture prevention

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ellen-sarver-dolgen/vitamin-d-calcium-supplements_b_3543283.html

The USPSTF today issued draft recommendations for effectiveness and potential harm of prescribing Vitamin D and Calcium in community dwelling men and pre-and post-menopausal women for the primary prevention of fractures.

Aging population, low bone mass and falls all contribute to a substantial health burden of fractures. Nearly 1 in 2 women older than 50 years of age will experience a fracture during her life time.
Currently, Vitamin D and Calcium supplementation are often advised for postmenopausal women to prevent fractures.

USPSTF recommendations on efficacy of Calcium and Vitamin D in preventing fractures are based on data from a total of 41,772 women across eight 8 RCTs with mean age between 53 to 80 years while for assessing the harm it reviewed the evidence from 9 RCTs with a total of 39,659 subjects, which also included 5,991 men.

The review of evidence concluded:

USPSTF found sufficient evidence to recommend against daily supplementation of 400 IU or less of vitamin D combined with 1,000 mg or less of calcium in prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women.

Evidence is also insufficient to make recommendations for greater than 400 IU of vitamin D and greater than 1000 mg of calcium supplementation in postmenopausal women.

At this time, there is insufficient evidence to determine the balance of benefits and harms of prescribing vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or combined, for the primary prevention of fractures in men and premenopausal women.

USPSTF found sufficient evidence that supplementation with vitamin D and calcium increases the incidence of kidney stones, although the magnitude of this harm was small.

This recommendation does not apply to persons living in institutional or nursing home care or with a history of osteoporotic fractures or those who are at increased risk for falls. It also does not apply to persons with a diagnosis of osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency.

USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis in women aged 65 or older and in younger women if they have a high fracture risk. Evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against screening for vitamin D deficiency in asymptomatic adults.

Full Text

For more news, join me on Facebook and Twitter