Showing posts with label fibroid volume. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fibroid volume. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Ulipristal acetate in medical management of fibroid



All symptomatic fibroid will eventually require treatment.

Absolute treatment is surgery consisting of  removing the myoma or the entire uterus, but there are patients  in whom Hysterectomy is not a feasible option, or patients who refuse surgery.

These patients have a choice between radiological or medical management. Radiological management consists of uterine artery embolization/ ultrasound ablation. All medical management offer short term relief and consists of progestin, aromatase inhibitors, GnRH analogues, and selective estrogen receptors modulators.  All these agents modify the hormonal milieu leading to shrinkage in size and decreasing the severity of symptoms.

Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a possible option for medical therapy. It most common use is for preoperative shrinkage of fibroids in reproductive age group women.  It is a steroid that reversibly binds to the progesterone (P) receptor in its target tissue, acting as a potent orally active P receptor modulator. It belongs to the class of drugs known as elective P receptor modulators (SPRMs).

This study aims to investigate the long term intermittent use of UPA in relieving fibroid symptoms.  It was designed by the sponsor (PregLem S.A.) makers of ESMYA, with the involvement of academic investigators and a contract study statistician (CROS NT).

This is the first double blind RCT for UPA  by Donnez J et al published in the January issue of journal of  Fertlity  and Sterility.

Study subjects consist of premenopausal women with fibroid size between 3-12 mm in diameter, menorrhagia and uterine size less than 16 weeks. All study participants were aged between 18 and 50 years inclusive, with body mass index 18–40 (kg/m2) and regular menstrual cycles of 22–35 days with FSH ≤20 IU/L.

The subjects were assigned to receive UPA 5mg or 10 mg and matching placebos for four 12-week courses. A drug holiday was held after each course and the subsequent course was started on second menstruation during the drug free period.

The primary endpoints were percentage of subjects with amenorrhea at the end of four course treatments, the safety endpoint included number of women withdrawing from the treatment due to the adverse effects.

At the end of completion of the study, it was seen that:


  • 75% of the subjects remained in the study for 20 months, demonstrating a very good compliance.
  • UPA 5 and 10 mg both resulted in amenorrhea, ≥70% of subjects achieved it in a week and the average post-treatment menstrual bleeding was markedly less comparing with pretreatment bleeding.
  • 73% of all subjects ended in amenorrhea with ≥25% reduction in fibroid volume at the end of treatment period.
  • The endometrial changes were benign and returned to pretreatment levels in 3 months post treatment.
  • Levels of E2 remained well above postmenopausal levels, evading the fear of decreased bone mineral density.


It was concluded that treatment with four 12-week treatment courses of UPA at doses of 5 and 10 mg was well tolerated. No differences were observed between the 5 and 10 mg dosing groups. At the end of treatment cycle more than three fourth women achieved amenorrhea and a reduction in fibroid size. 

This study also showed that UPA 5 mg as an intermittent therapy can be a good medical alternative in those women with fibroid who wish to avoid surgery or surgery is contraindicated.

References:

http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282%2815%2901960-3/fulltext