Showing posts with label endometrium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label endometrium. Show all posts

Monday, January 29, 2018

EMT helps predicts the potential success of IVF cycle and neonatal birth-weight


An Endometrial Thickness(EMT) of less than 7.0 mm results in lowest livebirth rates of about 22%, reports the results of a large retrospective, single-center study involving 2827 women, published electronically in forthcoming issue of Journal Reproductive BioMedicine Online. These cohort of women underwent 3350 IVF cycles with fresh embryos over a period of 4 years.

Endometrial thickness is still a part of standard cycle monitoring during IVF but lacks robust evidence in its favor as a potential predictor of live births and success rate of the cycle.

Endocrine profile is being increasingly used in infertility practice to predict the outcome of various ART techniques.

Multivariate regression analysis showed that EMT was non-linearly associated with live birth rates.

Thickness between 7.0 mm and 9.0 mm resulted in about 30% live birth rate while thickness less than 7.0 mm was associated with only 22% live birth rate and a decrease in neonatal birth weight.

The results of the study reaffirm the value of measuring EMT as a prognostic tool for predicting live birth rates and neonatal weights in women undergoing IVF with fresh embryo transfer along with endocrine profile in late follicular phase.

Friday, January 13, 2017

Luteal Start Vaginal Micronized Progesterone ups the rate of ongoing pregnancy in RPL.



vaginal micronized progesterone

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is one of the most traumatic and frustrating experience for patients and consulting obstetricians. It is an area of obstetrics lacking in evidence based diagnostic and treatment strategies. As per data by American Society for Reproductive Medicine(ASRM) it affects 15-25% of all pregnancies and in nearly 50% of cases the cause is not known.


Courtesy:Dr.Malpani Blog

Therapeutic interventions are generally based on the cause of RPL and data from observational studies and clinical experiences of the treating obstetrician. Treatment options range from active interventions in the form of hormonal supplementation to masterly inactivity (= reassurance).[i]

Progesterone (P) has long been used in the treatment of infertility because of its immunomodulator action on endometrium but it’s use is largely empirical along with other treatment regimen.  Cochrane review and meta-analysis concluded that P supplementation could improve the reproductive outcome in women with 3 or more pregnancy loss.

But, in none of these studies P was started after LH surge (luteal start) and varied route and dosing of P administration was used. [ii]

A new study published on line on January 9, 2017 in Fertility & Sterility international journal of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine assessed the effectiveness of luteal start vaginal micronized P in a recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) cohort.

In this observational, cohort study 116 women with a history of RPL were recruited and followed prospectively. Vaginal micronized progesterone was supplemented in dose of 100–200 mg every 12 hours starting 3 days after LH surge (luteal start corresponding to day 13 of the cycle) with or without >20% increase in levels of nuclear cyclin E (nCyclinE) expression. The controls did not receive P and had normal nCyclinE (≤20%). P was continued till 10 weeks of pregnancy.

The research team lead by Dr. Mary D. Stephenson tested Nuclear cyclin E (nCyclinE) levels to assess the state of endometrium. It is an endometrial molecular marker(EFT) and a cell cycle regulator, levels more than 20% after day 20 of the menstrual cycle correlates with a history of infertility. NCyclinE expression was determined by an EB was performed 9–11 days after the LH surge in previous cycle.

Of 116 women tested, 59 had high levels of nCyclinE and 57 had normal levels.
The results of the test were very promising with 68% pregnancy rate in study group as compared to women who did not take P. The chances of successful pregnancy increased from 6% to 69% in treatment group.

Six women needs to be treated with P to achieve one additional successful pregnancy.( Number need to treat). 

This observational study cannot establish causality, the researchers believe that P is beneficial in changing the endometrial milieu and benefitting the developing embryo.   

Dr. Stephenson said “The positive results show us that next we need to study progesterone as a treatment for recurrent pregnancy loss with a prospective randomized trial to validate the findings." 





[i] http://blog.drmalpani.com/2016/08/pgs-for-recurrent-pregnancy-loss-forget.html
[ii] Haas, M.D. and Ramsey, P.S. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;: CD003511

Friday, July 1, 2016

Does intentional endometrial curettage before embryo transfer increases the chances of successful outcome?

Clinical pearls:


  • Current research points in favor of performing endometrial scratching between day 7 of previous cycle to day 7 of the embryo transfer cycle resulting in improvement in clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rates in women with more than two previous embryo transfers. 

It is proposed that endometrial scratching or biopsy increases the chances of implantation in women attempting ARTs. With an intention to determine the current practice clinicians across Australia, New Zealand and the UK were given an on-line survey between August to October 2015.  The results of this study was published in the recent issue of Human Reproduction.[1]

In this cross- sectional study spanning 143 private and public fertility centers, 89% of physicians, embryologists and nurses perform the endometrial biopsy or scratching as a part of treatment protocols for couples undergoing IVF.[2]

The most common indication (92%) for the procedure was Recurrent Implantation failure (RIF) while only 3.6% clinicians offered it to patients trying to conceive by natural intercourse or IUI. Although many trials exist documenting the benefit of this procedure in couple trying to conceive naturally. [3]  
It was interesting to see that they all followed different time frame for doing the procedure.
89% of the centers offered the procedure in the luteal phase of the cycle prior to the embryo transfer cycle and none performed it on the day of egg retrieval or embryo-transfer.  
Two- thirds of the responders agreed that it is very useful in RIF undergoing IVF and more than 50% did not think it to be useful before the first IVF cycle.

Currently the most accepted explanation for the success is favorable immune modulation of the endometrium increasing the implantation rate. Other theories are it modulates the gene expression and increases the receptivity. [4]

A review of literature finds many RCTs conducted in the past to gauge the benefit of the procedure.
Results of Cochrane systemic review of 14 Randomized control trial(RCTs) shows that endometrial injury before starting the ovarian stimulation improves the chances of conception and ongoing pregnancy.[5] The evidence is moderate grade and suggests that “Endometrial injury performed between day 7 of the previous cycle and day 7 of the embryo transfer (ET) cycle is associated with an improvement in live birth and clinical pregnancy rates in women with more than two previous embryo transfers.”

With all these evidence pointing in favor of the procedure, a very large and robust study with sufficient power by Yeung et al[6] published in Human Reproduction showed that the procedure does not offer any benefits contrary to the previous beliefs. But, in this study about 70% of the patients received the procedure in their first IVF cycle so the results may not be generalized to patients with RIF.

To conclude, although current evidence is in favor of endometrial scratching, more evidence is needed in the form of large, randomized clinical trials regarding its timing in relation to menstrual cycle, use in women with or without RIF and its use in natural cycles, before this inexpensive and simple procedure can be widely applied in fertility clinics.





[1] http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/6/1241.abstract
[2] http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/6/1241.full.pdf+html
[3] Gibreel A, Badawy A, El-Refai W, El-Adawi N. Endometrial scratching to improve pregnancy rate in couples with unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39:680 – 684.
[4] Zhou L,Li RWang RHuang H-xZhong KLocal injury to the endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles improves implantation rates. Fertil Steril2008;89:1166-1176.
[5] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub3/pdf