Showing posts with label all-cause mortality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label all-cause mortality. Show all posts

Friday, November 24, 2017

North American Menopause Society (NAMS) video series about important midlife health topics: The Timing Hypothesis of HRT

The North American Menopause Society is proud of its comprehensive video series for clinicians about important midlife health topics. All the interviews in the series are hosted by NAMS Board of Trustees Member and Immediate Past President Dr. Marla Shapiro, a Canadian physician, who led this exciting initiative. Dr. Shapiro is also the medical consultant for CTV News.

In this latest video, The Timing Hypothesis, Dr. Shapiro interviews Dr. Peter Schnatz, Past President of NAMS and Associate Chairman and Residency Program Director in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Reading Hospital in Reading, Pennsylvania. Dr. Schnatz discusses the benefits of starting women on hormone therapy at the beginning of the menopause transition, along with the cardiovascular health advantages.   

The ELITE:Early Versus Late Intervention Trial With Estradiol also affirms the timing hypothesis in relation to timing of estradiol administration, when a beneficial cardiovascular effect is only seen in women with early, but not later menopause.





Tuesday, April 4, 2017

Preeclampsia doubles the risk of future major fatal and nonfatal coronary event.

History of preeclampsia in first pregnancy doubles the risk for Major Cardiac Event (MACEs) subsequently later in life for mothers, the risk is 2.8 times if the preeclamptic pregnancy resulted in SGA and/or preterm delivery. If the preeclampsia recurs in subsequent pregnancy the risk is 2.2 times while if it is combined again with in SGA and/or preterm delivery the risk increases nearly 5 times compared with women without preeclampsia according to new research study published in March issue of Journal of American Medical Association( JAMA).[1]

In this large register based prospective follow up study, the researchers linked the data from Medical Birth Registry of Norway(MBRN) with Cardiovascular Disease in Norway 1994–2009 (CVDNOR) project and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry.

Of 708 614 women registered with MBRN from 1980–2009, 506 350 women between 16-49 years of age with parity <5 met the study inclusion criteria’s.  The exposure of interest was preeclampsia defined according to the criteria by American Congress of Obstetrician and Gynecologists (ACOG).

The outcome of interest in the study was nonfatal acute myocardial infarction or coronary death, CVD or all-cause mortality.

Further the analyses was stratified by parity, assessing whether the exposure and outcome differed according to number of children born. Women with more than 1 births were grouped as no preeclampsia (control), women with preeclampsia  in first pregnancy, women with preeclampsia  in subsequent  pregnancy or preeclampsia in later but not first pregnancy.

The incidence of preeclampsia was 6% (29 917) in at least one pregnancy with 75% of these preeclamptic pregnancy (21 635) being the first pregnancy. Preeclamptic women were 2 times more likely to have a child born with SGA and 3 times more like to have a preterm labor as compared to women with no preeclampsia.

Women with only preeclampsia had 1.6 times increased risk of all-cause mortality which further increased to 3.7 with a child born with SGA and 2.8 times with preterm delivery as compared to women without preeclampsia.

After adjusting for confounders, the risk of MACE was highest in preeclamptic women who had SGA/ preterm delivery (4.7 times) and the risk was highest if preeclampsia occurs in first 2 pregnancy with SGA/ preterm birth.

During follow up 1275 (0.3%) women experienced MACEs and 468 (0.1%) mothers died due to CVD and 5411 (1.1%) due to any cause with majority of cardiac events occurred after the age of 50 years.

The study provide evidence to monitor these high-risk women who are at increased risk for coronary artery disease in future.

The full text of the article can be accessed here 







[1] http://jaha.ahajournals.org/content/6/3/e004158

Monday, September 19, 2016

Premature or early onset menopause is associated with increased risk of CVD and all-cause mortality.

Clinical pearls:

  • Women who had premature menopause are at high risk for CHD, CVD and all-cause mortality.
  • With every 1 in 3 women dying due to CVD, identifying those who are high risks for it is important from public health perspective.
  • Women with premature menopause can be benefited by pharmacological and life style interventions to prevent the increased all-cause mortality and CVD risk they are put at due to accelerated reproductive aging.

Majority of women around the world undergo menopause between 45 to 55 years of age with the average age being 51 years.[1] According to recent estimates about 5% of women attain natural menopause between the age of 41-45 years and additional 1% of have the last period before the age of 40.  Another 5% have premature menopause due to surgical removal of the ovaries, radiation and chemotherapy for malignancies or smoking.  The age at final menstrual period is of great public health significance and is considered as an important marker for predicting future cardiovascular, bone and overall health of the women. [2]

Women who attain menopause before 45 years of age have shorter total duration of estrogen exposure as compared to women who have menopause in 50s.

Multiple observational and cross sectional studies in the past have tried to assess the effect of loss of ovarian function and increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and all-cause mortality in women undergoing premature menopause.

A recent meta-analysis published in JAMA cardiology by Muka et al [3] tried to systemically review and meta-analyze the relationship between age and duration of menopause and increased risk of cardiovascular diseases.

The analysis included 32 studies consisting of 310,329 non-overlapping women in their analysis.

The investigators compared the outcomes between women who entered menopause before 45 years of age to those women who were 45 or older at the onset. It was seen that women in the early menopause group had 1.5 times the risk of overall coronary heart disease, 1.11 times the risk of fatal coronary heart disease,1.23 times the risk for overall stroke, 0.99 for stroke mortality, 1.19 times the risk for CVD mortality, and 1.12 for all-cause mortality as compared to women who had menopause after the age of 45 years.

Women who had menopause between age of 50-54 have decreased risk (.87 times) of suffering from fatal CHD as compared to women who had menopause before 50 years of age. The risk for stroke was comparable in both the groups.

With every 1 in 3 women dying due to CVD, identifying those who are high risks for it might be important from public health perspective. Menopause might be a crucial period in women’s life to evaluate her future risk for CVD and introduce interventions to reduce the risk.

In an invited commentary about the article by Dr JoAnn E Manson (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) and D. Teresa K Woodruff (Northwestern University), the authors stress upon the complicated relationship between menopause and CVD. They discuss the findings of the Framingham Heart Study which states that increase in systolic, diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol and other vascular risk factors around pre and peri menopausal years led to an accelerated menopause at a younger age. The data from the study provides an important clue about cardiovascular health being responsible for menopausal timing, but it does not exclude a bidirectional relationship. [4]

An earlier Meta-analysis of observational study showed that bilateral surgical oophorectomy was associated with more than double the risk of CVD (risk ratio=2.62). Women who are put on HRT after the surgery nullify their increased risk for CVD as compared to women with intact ovaries.

A detailed analysis of Women’s Health Initiative study also stressed the beneficial effects of HRT in relation to cardiovascular health when initiated between the ages of 50 to 59 years as compared to older women. [5]

The ELITE: Early Versus Late Intervention Trial With Estradiol also affirms the timing hypothesis in relation to timing of estradiol administration, when a beneficial cardiovascular effect is only seen in women with early, but not later menopause. [6]

To conclude, the findings of the review indicates that women who had premature menopause are at high risk for CHD, CVD and all-cause mortality.

Complex relationship exists between cardiovascular health and accelerated reproductive aging and further research is needed to clarify the issue, but currently women with premature menopause can be benefited by pharmacological and life style interventions to prevent the increased all-cause mortality and CVD risk they are put at due to accelerated reproductive aging.





[1] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285482/
[2] http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/infertility/
[3] http://cardiology.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2551981
[4] http://amaprod.silverchaircdn.com/data/Journals/CARDIOLOGY/0/hic160023.pdf.gif
[5] https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/whi/
[6] https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00114517