Showing posts with label abdominal hysterectomy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abdominal hysterectomy. Show all posts

Monday, June 5, 2017

ACOG updates it recommendations for selecting the best route of hysterectomy for benign diseases


ACOG updates its committee opinion for choosing the best route for Hysterectomy in Benign Disease. It replaces the Committee Opinion Number 444, issued November 2009.

In the United States, approximately 600,000 hysterectomies are performed each year, and the procedure is the second most frequently performed major surgical procedure among reproductive-aged women.

More than 50% of benign hysterectomies are performed for uterine fibroids followed by Abnormal uterine bleeding (42%), endometriosis (30%) and prolapse (18%), although some indications are overlapping.

Hysterectomies are performed vaginally, abdominally or laparoscopically (total laparoscopic hysterectomy [with or without robotic assistance] or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy).

An analysis of data in between 1998 – 2010 shows a decreasing trend of abdominal route (65% to 54%) in favor of Minimal Invasive Surgery. But, the vaginal approach has shown a consistent decline in use from 1998-2010 (25% to 17%).

The recommendations and conclusions are as follows:

Vaginal Hysterectomy should be the route of choice when feasible. Evidence supports that it is associated with shorter operation time, better outcome and it is also the most cost effective of all procedures. Society of Pelvic Reconstructive Surgeons has issued its own guidelines incorporating the uterine size, mobility, and accessibility of uterus to determine the best route of hysterectomy for a patient.

In patient with adnexal pathology, adhesions or endometriosis vaginal hysterectomy is not feasible, in such patient’s laparoscopic hysterectomy is the alternative of choice over open surgery.

Each patient should be evaluated for the route of hysterectomy based on clinical factors, anatomical characteristics and patient’s individual choice combined with surgeon’s training and experience.

The healthcare provider should discuss with each patient the best possible route for her, and she should be informed the pros and cons of each route based on her clinical situation.

Opportunistic salpingectomy can safely be performed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.  A 2015 study showed that the procedure can be accomplished in 88% of planned cases by vaginal route.

Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in cases of genetic mutation represents a total different clinical scenario. The procedure should be performed by laparoscopic or open abdominal approach to get proper tissue margins and inspect the peritoneal surface.

If patient choose to have a supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic or abdominal approach is best suited.

In case a laparoscopic approach is decided upon, the uterus can be removed intact or scalpel morcellation. Power morcellation is under scrutiny after Dr Amy Reed and her husband lobbied against its use in Minimal Invasive Surgery. The dangers of power morcellation, contained power morcellation should be discussed with patient and she should be explained about presence of an occult malignancy that may worsen the cancer prognosis.

The committee opinion can be accessed here. 
ACOG statement on power morcellator use in gynecological surgery can be accessed here.

Monday, December 7, 2015

Is routine cystoscopy to detect urinary tract injuries at gynecologic surgery feasible ?



Teeluckdharry et al. - Urinary Tract Injury at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and the Role of Cystoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Obstetrics & Gynecology, December 2015

This is a recent review and meta-analysis on role of routine use of cystoscopy in benign gynecological surgeries

Why this topic is important?

Injuries to the urinary tract, even if they occur relatively infrequently, can cause significant morbidity. Thus, intraoperative detection and recognition of urinary tract injuries remain very important for patients and gynecologists because they decrease morbidity and result in less litigation. Up to 75% of ureteric injuries are caused by gynecologic surgery and interestingly, most injuries occur during procedures for benign diseases.

What is the aim of the study?

The study aims to derive the rate of routine urinary tract injuries during benign gynecological surgeries and does routine use cystoscopy is a safeguard against them.

The subjects and the study design.

It is a Systematic review with pooled data from 79 studies between January 2004 to August 2014.


Interesting table in the study:

source:http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2015/12000/Urinary_Tract_Injury_at_Benign_Gynecologic_Surgery.7.aspx


Main outcome results:

The study got an adjusted ureteric injury rate of 0.3% and a bladder injury rate of 0.8%. The estimated postoperative ureteric injury detection rates per 1,000 surgeries were 1.6 without routine cystoscopy and 0.7 with routine cystoscopy. Postoperative bladder injury detection rates per 1,000 surgeries were 0.8 without routine cystoscopy and 1.0 with routine cystoscopy.
The study found that the proportion of ureteric and bladder injuries detected intraoperatively without routine cystoscopy is approximately 18% and 79%, respectively. However, when cystoscopy is performed, the proportion of ureteric or bladder injuries detected intraoperatively increases to approximately 95%.

What were the study strengths and weaknesses?
The study combines pooled data from a total of 79 studies but the the majority of studies were retrospective  which lowers postoperative injury detection rates.
What are the “practice essentials” learned from the study?
The study concludes that until more evidence is accumulated, the clinicians should learn the skills and maintain a low threshold for performing cystoscopy selectively in any cases in which there is suspicion of ureteric or bladder injury.

References: