Showing posts with label World Congress on Endometriosis in Vancouver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World Congress on Endometriosis in Vancouver. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Elagolix shows promising results for long term treatment of endometriosis

Elagolix has the potential to be an important treatment option for long term medical treatment for Endometriosis, reports the results of two replicate, randomized double blind, phase III studies. The paper was presented at the 13th World Congress on Endometriosis in Vancouver, Canada and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist. It results in rapid, reversible, dose-dependent inhibition of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion, leading to reduced ovarian production of the sex hormones, oestradiol and progesterone, while on therapy.

Medical management of Endometriosis requires treatment for extended period and physicians currently have very limited options in this regard. Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, such as leuprolide acetate cannot be extended beyond 6 months because of osteoporosis and sever vasomotor symptoms.

These two-trial recruited 1,689 premenopausal women between the ages of 18 and 49 years, who had endometriosis and suffered from moderate to severe pain and had a z score of more than -1.5 for bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip. The study participants were from 151 sites in the United States and Canada from July 2012 through May 2014 and for Elaris EM-II at 187 sites on five continents from November 2013 through July 2015.

Each woman was randomly assigned to receive 150 mg of elagolix once daily (lower-dose group), 200 mg of elagolix twice daily (higher-dose group), or placebo.

The results were evaluated in terms of proportion of women who had clinical response for dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pain after 3 months of treatment. Other relevant clinical parameters tested were dyspareunia, use of rescue NSAIDs and opioids, dyspareunia and non-menstrual pain at 6 months of treatment.

In both the trials, women showed statistically significant response in terms of dyspareunia and non-menstrual pain at 3 months of treatment as compared to placebo. The response was sustained at 6 months of treatment for these two parameters.

Women who received the higher dose of elagolix (200 mg twice daily) had significantly better results with respect to the use of rescue analgesic agents at 3 months and 6 months, dyspareunia at 3 months, and rescue opioid use at 3 months than did those receiving placebo.

Treatment with Elagolix improved the quality of life based on the 30-item Endometriosis Health Profile dimensions in both groups as compared to placebo.

Because of its hypoestrogenic effect, more than 70% women in the trial reported adverse effect including hot flushes and changes in bone mineral density and lipid levels but the frequency differed significantly between the higher and lower dose groups.

Professor Hugh Taylor, lead author of the resulting paper said, “The idea that we now have choices with regards to the extent of oestrogen suppression is attractive, as it allows us to provide a more personalised and individualised therapy.”

“With elagolix – unlike with Lupron (leuprolide acetate)– we can partially suppress oestrogen, unlike the “all or nothing” current approach,” he further added.

Elagolix is currently being investigated in uterine fibroids and endometriosis, and has been studied in over 40 clinical trials totalling more than 3,000 women. AbbVie, the makers of the drug, plans to submit a New Drug Application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for endometriosis in 2017. 

Full text of the article in NEJM can be accessed here




Tuesday, May 23, 2017

Hysterosalpingography with oil-based contrast boosts pregnancy rates: A landmark study




Infertile women undergoing Hysterosalpingography (HSG) with an oil based contrast have a 10% higher chances of getting pregnant and continue the pregnancy as compared to women who have HSG with a water based medium reports results of a multicentric, randomized trial from Netherlands.

The study was published online May 18 in the New England Journal of Medicine and presented at the 13th World Congress on Endometriosis in Vancouver, Canada.

Looking back, the debate about superiority of one medium over other has been going on for 50 years. It is known that flushing of the fallopian tube enhances fertility, but controversy about the type of medium continues.

First HSG was carried out by Carey in 1914 and he used collergol. Lipiodol was introduced by Sicard and Forestier in 1924 and remained a popular contrast medium for many decades. Later, water-soluble contrast material was generally preferred as it avoided the possible complication of oil embolism.

A 2007 update of Cochrane review concluded that “Flushing of the tubes with oil-soluble media increases subsequent pregnancy rates in infertility patients. Clinicians should consider flushing the tubes with OSCM before contemplating more invasive therapies.”

While other smaller studies have reported that contrast does not affect the cumulative pregnancy rate.

The current study called the The H2Oil study was conducted by Professor Ben W.J. Mol along with Dr. Kim Dreyer & Dr. Velja Mijatovic from the Department of Reproductive Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, and their multi-center research team from 27 hospitals in the Netherlands.

The study recruited 1,119 women who were undergoing fertility treatment and were advised hysterosalpingography (HSG). The women were randomized to a standard HSG with water-soluble contrast medium (WSCM)(Hystero) or another group which used an oil-based contrast with Lipiodol Ultra-Fluide. (LIPIODOL Ultra-Fluid 480 Injection 10 mL, GUERBET). (Ethiodol in the United States). Then couples received expectant management or the women underwent intrauterine insemination.

All women were between 18 and 39 years of age, with regular menstrual cycles, and were undergoing treatment for infertility for at least 1 year.

The primary outcome measure was positive fetal heart rate by USG at 12 weeks of pregnancy within 6 months of the HSG test. Multiple secondary outcomes were tested like positive pregnancy test by USG, live birth, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage and pain scores by the Visual-Analogue Scale for Pain.

After statistical analysis at 6 months, it was seen that 220(39.7%) in oil-based group had an ongoing pregnancy versus 161(29.1%) in water based group (P <.001). The oil based group also had considerable more live birth rates, 38.8% versus 28.1% (P <.001).   

Professor Mol said “This means that for every ten women undergoing an HSG to test their fallopian tubes, if Lipiodol® is used for that test, there will be one more pregnancy six months later and, consequently, one more baby nine months after that.”

The groups were comparable to each other in terms of bilateral tubal patency, pain score, miscarriage rates, ectopic pregnancy, twins, stillbirth rates and median duration of pregnancy.  

“If we move to the use of Lipiodol® Ultra-Fluid for routine diagnostic tubal patency testing, more women will have a successful fertility outcome and will avoid the need for other expensive fertility treatments such as IVF. I believe that is justifiable at this point,” he further added.

Professor Mol has a personal connection with the study which came to light only when he started researching about HSG. He himself was born, after his mother underwent HSG using Lipiodol after being infertile for 9 years.  

Professor Neil Johnson, President of the World Endometriosis Society concluded “This new study from our Dutch colleagues confirms beyond doubt the fertility value of Lipiodol® Ultra-Fluid.”