Showing posts with label USPSTF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USPSTF. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

USPSTF updates its ovarian cancer screening guidelines


The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against screening for ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women who are not at high-risk for ovarian cancer. This update is in consensus with its previous 2012 recommendations. The updated guidelines were published in recent issue of Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA).

USPSTF advise against screening for ovarian cancer in women who are asymptomatic and not at high-risk of hereditary cancer syndrome (D recommendation).

The presenting symptoms for ovarian cancer (bloating, constipation, abdominal pain or pressure, urinary symptoms, back pain, or fatigue) are nonspecific and may be present in both healthy women and women with late-stage ovarian cancer; therefore, these cannot be used to detect cancer at a very early stage.

This decision is based on benefits and harms of the screening test and cost was not considered in formulating the recommendations.

Ovarian cancer is the fifth in the list of cancer-specific mortality and tops the list of deaths due to gynecological malignancies, despite its low incidence of 11.4 cases per 100,000 women per year.

Many women who undergo screening for ovarian cancer receive false positive reports as the screening tests have low specificity.

courtesy: Thinkstock

USPSTF has sufficient evidence to recommend that screening with transvaginal ultrasound, testing for the serum tumor marker cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), or a combination of both does not reduce ovarian cancer mortality.

Routine pelvic examination and bimanual palpation also do not help in early detection of cancer; furthermore, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial discontinued it as a screening test because not a single case was detected based only on bimanual pelvic examination.

The number of false -positive cases may result in unnecessary surgery and further testing for women who are cancer-free.

Women with hereditary cancer syndromes such as women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic mutations should follow the specific recommendations and talk to their healthcare providers for guidance and cancer screening.

The recommendations are in agreement with the 2012 recommendations because the result of large UKCTOCS trial was published which in consensus with the PLCO trial, did not find sufficient evidence that screening for ovarian cancer reduces ovarian cancer mortality in asymptomatic women.

These recommendations are also in consensus with other major organizations like American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Cancer Society American College of Radiology and the American Academy of Family Physicians. 





Thursday, December 14, 2017

Do not use HRT solely for primary prevention of chronic diseases: USPSTF final recommendation


The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against the use of HRT in asymptomatic post-menopausal women solely for preventing chronic diseases in its final statement published yesterday in JAMA.

The recommendation holds good for estrogen alone or combined with progestin and upholds the previous 2012 statement.

The USPSTF statement does acknowledge few benefits of HRT in postmenopausal women such as reducing the risk of fractures and diabetes, but the potential harms outweigh the moderate benefits cited.

Combined use of estrogen and progestin is associated with increased risk of invasive breast cancer, coronary artery disease, venous thromboembolism, stroke, dementia, gallbladder disease, and urinary incontinence.

Use of estrogen alone predisposes the women to greater risk for thromboembolism, stroke, dementia, gallbladder disease, and urinary incontinence.

The recommendations were based on evidence from  Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trials, which were stopped early because of sufficient evidence of serious adverse effects in postmenopausal women.

The USPSTF statement is accompanied by an editorial by Cora E. Lewis, MD, MSPH, from the Division of Preventive Medicine at University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, and Melissa F. Wellons, MD, MHS, from the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee says that although the WHI trial was a observational study, till date no large sufficiently powered trials exist to recommend against the WHI conclusions.

The authors further asserted that these recommendations do not apply to “women who are considering hormone therapy for the management of menopausal symptoms, such as hot flashes or vaginal dryness. It also does not apply to women who have had premature menopause (primary ovarian insufficiency) or surgical menopause.”  

Also, the route of administration considered in the study is oral or transdermal and not creams and rings because those are not generally used for primary prevention of chronic conditions.

The editorial also mentions about the “timing hypothesis” put forward by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology in its July 2017 updated guidelines on menopause.

USPSTF statement stats that there is not sufficient evidence to support the “timing hypothesis” at present. It requires very large, sufficiently powered studies to evaluate the risk/benefit ratio in this specific age group.

At present, few women are on HRT, and physicians consider HRT only for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Relatively healthy, younger menopausal women with severe climacteric symptoms may be prescribed HRT for symptoms relief and not for chronic disease prevention.



Tuesday, January 12, 2016

USPSTF recommends biennial breast cancer screening beginning at age 50.





The USPSTF today once more made an important update to its 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for breast cancer. The USPSTF recommends biennial screening mammography for women aged 50 to 74 years. (B recommendation).These recommendations were published in the on-line issue of Annals of Internal Medicine on January 12, 2016.



Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations for Average-Risk Women

Agency issuing guidelines
Recommendations
USPSTF 2015

40–49 years
Screening decision should be an informed, individual one, after she weighs the potential benefit against the potential harms.( C recommendations )
50–74 years
Mammography every 2 years (B recommendation)
≥75 years
Data were not sufficient to establish the benefits of mammography screening in women aged 75 years or older.( I statement)
ACOG            

40 years ≥
Annual mammograms beginning at age 40.
ACS

 45 years
Annual screening beginning at age 45
45-54 years
Annual screening
55 and older
Transition to biennial screening or have the opportunity to continue screening annually depending upon personal preference. Women should continue screening mammography as long as their overall health is good and they have a life expectancy of 10 years or longer
NCCN

40 years ≥
Clinical breast exam every 6-12 + annual mammogram beginning at age 40years.

Upper age limit for screening not established; screening can continue if the woman is in good health and is expected to live at least 10 more years
  

Breast cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States.

In 2015, an estimated 232 000 women were diagnosed with the disease and 40,000 women died of it.

There are approximately 125 new cases of breast cancer and about 22 deaths per 100 000 U.S. women each year. The mean age at diagnosis has remained unchanged at 64 years since the late 1970s.

It is most frequently diagnosed among women aged 55 to 64 years, and the median age of death from breast cancer is 68 years.

Across all ages, screening mammography has a sensitivity of approximately 77% to 95% and a specificity of about 94% to 97%

Dr.Christine Laine praises the USPSTF in an accompanying editorial saying that “The USPSTF did a difficult job well, considering updated evidence reviews, fuller panoply of potential harms, and tradeoffs of different screening strategies.”

She also said that “ Although for many years the dogma was that women should have mammograms “once a year for a lifetime” starting at age 40 years, current evidence shows that the balance of risks and benefits of screening, particularly among women in their 40s, warrants more nuanced decision making. Potential harms of over diagnosis and overtreatment of lesions with little progressive potential and harms of false-positive screening results with unnecessary biopsies and multiple repeated examinations must be considered”.

The following recommendation (originally issued in 2009) still stands: Each average-risk woman between the ages of 40 and 49 years should make her own decision about whether to have a mammogram, based on her personal balancing of the benefits and harms of screening (a grade “C” recommendation).


Benefit of Screening

Over a 10-year period, screening 10 000 women aged 60 to 69 years will result in 21 (95% CI, 11 to 32) fewer breast cancer deaths. The benefit is smaller in younger women: Screening 10 000 women aged 50 to 59 years will result in 8 (CI, 2 to 17) fewer breast cancer deaths, and screening 10 000 women aged 40 to 49 years will result in 3 (CI, 0 to 9) fewer breast cancer deaths.


Harms of screening

The harms of screening are over diagnosis and over screening that is diagnosis and treatment of non invasive and invasive cancer that would never have been detected in the absence of screening. Existing technology does not allow us to segregate with precision about how much is over diagnosis and how much was real diagnosis.

The best estimates from randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality suggest that 1 in 5 women diagnosed with breast cancer over approximately 10 years will be over diagnosed.

Based on data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program: The baseline breast cancer incidence rate was 105 to 111 cases per 100 000 women (depending on whether one considers invasive disease or invasive plus noninvasive disease together). With the widespread diffusion of mammography screening in last 30 years, this rate increased to 165 cases of noninvasive plus invasive disease per 100 000 women in 2011 (an excess of 54 to 60 cases per 100 000 women, or about a 50% increase).

Breast cancer mortality rates have declined at a slower rate, from 31 to 22 cases (or a reduction of 9 deaths) per 100,000 women over the same time period.

The USPSTF concludes that while there are harms of mammography, the benefit of screening mammography outweighs the harms by at least a moderate amount from age 50 to 74 years and is greatest for women in their 60s. For women in their 40s, the number who benefit from starting regular screening mammography is smaller and the number experiencing harm is larger compared with older women.

The current recommendations by USPSTF are based upon modeling studies conducted in support by the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET). The investigators at CISNET evaluated data from six models that were grouped according to various screening strategies, various starting age and frequency.  The model with no screening served as reference.

It was seen that strategies involving screening every 2 years were consistently the most efficient for women at average risk for breast cancer.

The models showed that for women in the age group 50 to 74 years, biennial screening would prevent a median of seven breast-cancer deaths, compared with no screening vs. if the screening started at age 40, three additional breast cancer deaths would be prevented, but there would be 1988 more false-positive results and seven more over diagnoses for every 1000 women screened.


Dissatisfaction with the updated guidelines.

Many of the National agencies like National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center are continue to screen women annually beginning at age 40 till she is within a decade of the predicted end of her life according to Therese Bevers, MD, medical director of the Cancer Prevention Center at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and chair of NCCN guideline panels on breast cancer screening and diagnosis and breast cancer risk reduction.

National breast cancer screening programs in other countries like the United Kingdom,  Netherlands, Switzerland, Poland, Norway, Luxembourg, Germany, Finland, Denmark, and Belgium offer mammography screening every 2 to 3 years for women aged 50 up to 74 years.


References: