Showing posts with label Talc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Talc. Show all posts

Thursday, August 4, 2016

Douching doubles the risk of developing ovarian cancer.

Clinical pearls:

  • Douching and not talc was associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer in the sister study. 
  • ACOG and NHS both does not support douching and other vaginal washing practices that do more harm than good by eliminating the healthy vaginal flora. 



A National Health study in US linked the age old ritual of douching to subsequent development of ovarian cancer. Women who douche have nearly twice the risk as compared to women who do not practice it.

According to Department of Health and Human services(HHS) one quarter of women between the ages of 15 and 44 practice douching. [1] Studies have linked douching to Bacterial Vaginosis, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease(PID), STIs, including HIV, preterm birth, ectopic pregnancy and vaginal irritation or dryness. [2] A meta-analysis of more than 10,000 HIV-negative women in sub-Saharan Africa found that intravaginal use of drying agents was associated with an increased risk of BV and HIV.[3] 

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and most practitioners strongly advice against douching and ACOG list it as one of the cause of vaginitis, women continue to practice it because of they see it as a cleaning ritual leading to positive health benefits.[4] The NHS also advise against douching and use of scented wipes and vaginal deodorants.

The new National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences study published online on 20 June,2016 in the Epidemiology Journal recruited 50,884 participants of the “Sister study” and followed them to see the link between douching and ovarian cancer. [5]The sister study is conducted by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the US Department of Health and Human Services. The study enrolled 50,884 women between ages 35–74 whose sister have breast cancer and followed them from 2003 to 2009, across all 50 US states and Puerto Rico.  Due to the shared environment and genetics, this landmark study provides a great chance of identifying risk factors for breast cancer.

All the women were free of breast or ovarian cancer at baseline. The women were asked about douching and use of talc during the previous 12 months before enrolment.

At the end of the follow up period (median 6.6 years) 154 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Women practicing douching has nearly twice the odds of developing malignancy as compared to women who did not douche. The association looked even stronger when only women without the breast cancer gene in the family were analyzed.

Contrary to previous studies, this particular study did not find any association between talc use and ovarian cancer. (HR=0.73) although talc users were twice as likely to practice douching. (OR=2.1)
This is the first study to trying to find a link between douching and ovarian cancer.

Senior author Clarice Weinberg commented: “There are a number of health reasons not to douche, and I can’t think of any reason to do it.”

Vagina cleans itself naturally and douching cause more harm by cleaning away the healthy bacterial flora. The Office on Women's Health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) says that due to squirting of the douching solution the bacteria are pushed inside uterus, fallopian tube causing PID.

A study conducted by Brown, J et al in 2016 shows women practice intravaginal washing due to personal hygiene and sexuality. It is common to get cleaned up after or before sex. Majority of these women learn the practices from their mothers or electronic or print media. Many women believe that since departmental stores aisles are packed with these products of personal hygiene, they must be safe to use.

But douching products do not fall under FDA regulation, as they are considered cosmetics. Hence, these products do not have to undergo safety tests like drugs.

The pilot study does not prove causation and larger studies are needed in the area. Perhaps women who douche frequently might have other pathologies going on which may be the cause for the behavior. We need to see more studies in the future. 



[1]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Key Statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006–2010.
[2] http://womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/douching.html#
[3] Low N, Chersich MF, Schmidlin K, Egger M, Francis SC, van de Wijgert JH, et al. Intravaginal practices, bacterial vaginosis, and HIV infection in women: individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS medicine. 2011;8(2):e1000416. 
[4] http://www.acog.org/Patients/FAQs/Vaginitis
[5] http://journals.lww.com/epidem/Abstract/publishahead/Douching,_Talc_Use,_and_Risk_of_Ovarian_Cancer_.98997.aspx

Friday, February 26, 2016

Talc powder and ovarian cancer! Does evidence prove causation?



Recently a Missouri jury has awarded $72 million to the family of an Alabama woman who died from ovarian cancer in October 2015, which she said was caused by using Johnson & Johnson's baby powder and other products containing talcum powder.

The jury found Johnson & Johnson guilty of negligence, and conspiring to hide facts by not issuing a warning on the product used.

The general public has spoken in favor of the women but, does evidence linking use of the talcum powder as feminine hygiene product and development of ovarian cancer exist in studies and clinical research?

Talcum powder is made from talc, a mineral made up mainly of the elements magnesium, silicon, and oxygen. As a powder, it absorbs moisture well and helps cut down on friction, making it useful for keeping skin dry and helping to prevent rashes.

Since early 1980s, a few studies have found that women who regularly used talc powder for feminine hygiene had higher than average rates of ovarian cancer. Yet the evidence–which fell short of proving causation–was mostly confined to medical journals, and not known to general public.

According to an article published in Journal of  Toxicology and  Environmental Health 1976 Nov;2(2):255-84, researchers at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York published test results  on 20 talc-based consumer products, including baby and facial powders. All the formulations were before 1973. Of the 20 products 10 contained detectable amounts of tremolite and anthophyllite, principally asbestiform, while some also contained fragmented forms of these minerals They found two types of asbestos, tremolite and  anthophyllite, in 10 of the 20 products.

Before the 1970s, talcum powder was often contaminated with asbestos fibres which are known to cause cancer. But since then, all home products containing talcum powder are legally obliged to be asbestos-free.

J &J claims that all its talcum products are free of talc and are manufactured according to strict US pharmacopoeia standard.

Dr. Daniel Cramer, MD, ScD, an obstetrician/gynecologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston and a prominent researcher in this field opines that talc does cause ovarian cancer. He was the first to link talc with ovarian cancer in his pilot study published in 1982.

He has recently published a paper in Epidemiology journal December 2015 issue, citing over 20 well executed case-control studies that support this association. In this article he has established a dose –response relationship with the trend increasing as number of years of talc use accrues. According to him “Subtypes of ovarian cancer more likely to be associated with talc included invasive serous and endometrioid tumors and borderline serous and mucinous tumors”.

Many other control studies have documented a 30% increase in risk of ovarian cancer, but the single cohort study done has not documented causation.

Due to this inconclusive research evidence, talcum powder is classified by the InternationalAgency for Research on Cancer (IARC) aspossibly carcinogenic (cancer causing) to humans when applied to the genital area. IARC is a part of the World Health Organisation which convenes international expert working groups to evaluate the evidence of the carcinogenicity of specific exposures.

While the American Cancer Society says “It is not clear if consumer products containing talcum powder increase cancer risk”.

Many research papers and epidemiology studies have specifically evaluated talc and perineal use and these studies have found talc to be safe. For example, the Nurses’ Health Study (2010)2 and the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Cohort (2014)3 are two large-scale prospective studies looking at talc and ovarian cancer. Both found no causal relationship between talc and ovarian cancer.” Both these studies were criticized insufficient exposure to the talc powder.

Meanwhile the J& J spokesperson Carol Goodrich said, "We sympathize with the plaintiff's family but firmly believe the safety of cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence." The company is expected to appeal the ruling.

The possible mechanism of cancer causation by the talc is chronic inflammation. Very small particles of talc migrate from vagina to the upper genital tract. In fact, Jackie Fox, whose ovarian cancer prompted the court case in St Louis, had talc found in her surgically removed ovaries, according to news reports.

The American Cancer Society advises the consumers to use corn starch based products, until a definite answer to the role played by talcum powder in ovarian cancer causation is found.

The US National Toxicology Program (NTP) is formed from parts of several different government agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The NTP has not fully reviewed talc (with or without asbestos) as a possible carcinogen.

Further research is needed to determine whether and how talcum powder might increase the risk of ovarian cancer.


References: