Showing posts with label BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.. Show all posts

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Breast and Ovarian Cancer risk with BRCA mutation precisely quantified for first time.

https://www.behance.net/gallery/42360897/CDC-Know-BRCA

Women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have an average risk of 72% and 69% respectively of developing breast cancer by the age of 80. The corresponding life time risks for ovarian cancer is 44% for BRCA1 and 17% for BRCA2 says the results of first ever prospective study published June 20, 2017 in JAMA.

BRCA1 was first discovered 23 years ago in 1994 by Mary-Claire King, professor of genome sciences and of medicine at University of Washington, BRCA2 followed later.

Today it is an established fact that women who test positive for BRCA mutation are not only at increased risk for breast cancer but also at increased risk for ovarian cancer, but all the studies so far have been retrospective in nature.


According to NIH, together, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for about 20 to 25 percent of hereditary breast cancers and about 5 to 10 percent of all breast cancers. Similarly, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for around 15 percent of ovarian cancers.

This current prospective study was made possible by collaboration between researchers at Australia, Europe and USA. The team recruited 10,000 women with BRCA1(6036) and BRCA2 (3820) mutations from 1997 to 2011 from various registries across U.K, Netherlands and France.

Some very important findings of the study are:

Women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have an average risk of 72% and 69% respectively of developing breast cancer by the age of 80. The corresponding life time risks for ovarian cancer is 44% for BRCA1 and 17% for BRCA2 

Of nearly 10,000 women, 5046 were unaffected and 4810 were diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer or both at baseline.

At follow up, 11% of women developed breast cancer, 2% developed ovarian cancer and 11% were affected with contralateral breast cancer.

The median age of women at diagnosis of the breast and ovarian cancer was 38 years and 47 years for contralateral breast cancer.

Another important finding in the study was, breast cancer risk for women with faults in BRCA1 increases till age 40, and for BRCA2 it increases till age 50 years of age and then remains constant high level for the rest of their lives.

The risk of getting a diagnosis of second breast cancer for contralateral breast up to 20 years of first cancer was 40% for BRCA1 carriers and 26% for BRCA2 carriers.

The incidence of ovarian cancer increased with age up to 61 to 70 years for both mutations but was about 3 times higher for BRCA1 carriers.

The risk of breast cancer nearly doubles for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, with an increase in number of first and second-degree relatives having breast cancer.

The lead author, Antonis Antoniou, PhD, from the Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom explained "This is important information to inform the clinical management also of women with mutations over the age of 60 years old."

The study also revealed that the risk for breast cancer is stratified according to location of the mutation in certain regions, but location did not appear to affect the risk for ovarian cancer.

Dr Antoniou said, "The results from this study show clearly, and again for the first time in a prospective study, that the cancer risks for women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations depend on the position of the specific fault within the gene."

"Moreover, the study provides for the first-time cancer risk estimates for mutations at different locations," he added. "Therefore, mutation location can now be confidently incorporated in the risk assessment of women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations."

http://www.prweb.com
This study has important implications for physicians in clinical practice as they can improve the advice and counselling, precisely pointing at the risk faced by the women. It also emphasizes the importance of family history and following the risk reducing life style changes.

Dr Antonis Antoniou says, "We have been able to provide the most precise estimates of age-specific risks to date. These should provide more confidence in the counseling and clinical management of women with faults in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes."

The strengths of the study are its prospective nature, prolong follow-up and large data base because of sharing of data across multiple centers.



Thursday, November 12, 2015

A New Paradigm for Prevention of Ovarian Cancer



A New Paradigm for Prevention of Ovarian Cancer

This article is based on a paper by Nezhat R et al in September, 2015  issue of American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.


  • It is estimated by American Cancer society that 21,290 new cases of ovarian cancer will be diagnosed in 2015, and 14,180 deaths from ovarian cancer will occur during that period.

  • The incidence of ovarian cancer varies geographically. The incidence is high in the Western world. The age-standardized rate (per 100,000 females) is only 3.8 in China, relatively lower than developed countries such the USA (8.8) and Australia (7.7).

  • A woman has a 1:70 lifetime risk of being diagnosed with ovarian cancer, the second most common gynecologic malignancy, with the highest mortality rate.

  • The majority of ovarian malignancies are epithelial in origin, and within this group the serous type is the most frequent.

  • There is currently no effective screening method available for the detection of this disease, which has an overall five-year survival rate of approximately 45%.

  • Apart from the genetics and modifiable risk factors responsible for causation of cancer, a new theory by Nezhat et al holds that serous ovarian cancer begins in the Fallopian tube from where it spreads onto the ovarian surface.

  • Nezhat and colleagues classify ovarian cancers on the basis of etiology into two groups. Type I cancers originate from various ovarian pathologies (borderline ovarian tumors, endometriomas). These cancers typically have a more favorable prognosis because they are diagnosed at an earlier stage and metastasize more slowly.

  • The more frequent type II tumors originate from the fimbriated end of the Fallopian tube and have a less favorable prognosis because they are often diagnosed at an advanced stage.

  • Two large collaborative studies have recently called attention to the role of tubal ligation on reducing the ovarian cancer risk.

  • The reduction is the greatest for endometrioid and clear-cell carcinoma, and is thought to be associated with the prevention of retrograde menstruation, ovarian seeding by endometrial cells, and inflammation.

  • The Society of Gynecologic Oncology also recommends that for women at average risk of ovarian cancer, risk-reducing salpingectomy should also be discussed and considered in patients at the time of abdominal or pelvic surgery, after completion of child-bearing.

  • The interventions called for salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy, salpingectomy for permanent sterilization instead of tubal ligation, and referral for all patients with high-grade serous cancer for hereditary cancer counseling and genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

  • Although still in its infancy, these 3 recommendations are projected to reduce ovarian cancer rates in this province by 40% over the next 20 years.

  • These clinical observations and the new recent evidence for the dual pathogenesis of ovarian cancer have set ground for implementing new strategies for screening and prevention programs to reduce the incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer.

  • In light of the accumulated data and observations regarding endometriosis and ovarian cancer, Nezhat R. et al propose that it is time to establish criteria for identifying and monitoring women with endometriosis for risk factors and to pursue risk-reducing medical and surgical treatment options in these women.

  • At the time of surgical diagnosis and treatment, consideration for complete resection of pelvic endometriosis, salpingectomy, oophorectomy, or hysterectomy should be individualized based on a patient’s age, desire for future fertility, and preoperative consultation with the patient.

  • These initiatives, if validated by level 1 evidence, should substantially reduce the risk of ovarian cancer as well as the total mortality risk.

  • For now, however, it seems that we may have tools in the future to combat a disease with a high mortality rate.

References:

  1. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@editorial/documents/document/acspc-044552.pdf

  1. Pasalich M, Su D, Binns CW, Lee AH. Reproductive factors for ovarian cancer in southern Chinese women. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2013;24(2):135-140. doi:10.3802/jgo.2013.24.2.135.

  1. Hanna L, Adams M. Prevention of ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:339-362.

  1. Freedman J. Ovarian cancer: current and emerging trends in detection and treatment. New York: Rosen Publishing Group; 2009.

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29.

  1. http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378%2815%2900325-7/fulltext

  1. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/853973#vp_2