Sunday, April 10, 2016

Endocrine Society issues a position statement against custom compounded Hormone therapy



The Endocrine Society cautious physicians against the use of compounded hormone for treatment of menopausal symptoms, female sexual dysfunction, and thyroid disorders in a scientific statement issued at Endo 16, the Annual Meeting at Boston from April 1-4, 2016.

The Society  supported the use of  FDA approved therapies and asserted that custom compounded Hormone formulations should only be used when the patient is allergic or does not tolerate  the FDA approved drugs and treatment is cardinal to his/her health.

“By no means do I wish to disparage the practice of pharmacists who are measuring hormones and providing them to patients,” Nanette Santoro, MD, professor and chair of reproductive endocrinology and infertility, department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Colorado Denver, said during a press conference discussing the recommendations. “Where we get into scientific trouble ... is as soon as something is being custom compounded, it’s being measured out and added to a variety of agents and diluters that will make it into a pill or a gel. ... How these excipients influence how these hormones get into a person, and what that hormone does, is essentially unknown.”

She also opined that one third to one quarter of all the drugs prescribed for menopausal hormone therapy are custom compounds as observed in a recent survey. She was also appalled at the large amount bioidentical and formulations available in the market that are similar to FDA approved therapies. “It is also a perversion of the intent of the practice of custom compounding,” She added.

This statement is also endorsed by a number of other societies like American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the North American Menopause Society; nonetheless almost 60% of clinicians prescribe so-called bioidentical compounded menopausal hormone therapy, against recommendations from major medical societies, according to a new survey.

Custom compound hormone is a big business, with annual sales of $ 1 billion, and  are largely popular among patients as many clinicians prescribe them telling they are without any side effects. But, the reality is the side effects have never been tested. “What has happened is the absence of evidence of harm is taken as proof of safety,” Santoro said. “This is very illogical, yet it pervades the media and the popular press. You see happy people with anecdotes ... what we don’t know are how much they’re getting and what are the biological endpoints?”

Currently, the only indication for prescribing compounding therapy is in a woman who needs testosterone since there is no good commercially available drug in market added Dr Sklar, who is an assistant professor of medicine and endocrinology at Georgetown University Medical Center and George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

The endocrine society new document provides detailed review of many FDA approved hormonal products:

  • No randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials demonstrating efficacy of compounded bioidentical drugs in relieving menopausal symptoms exists as also no trials comparing FDA approved therapy vs. compounding formulations  could be found.
  • For Menopausal Hormone therapy, non oral formulations are associated with reduced risk of venous thromboembolism and stroke.
  • Micronized Progesterone is a treatment of choice opted by some physician, and is considered safe biochemically, but evidence is lacking regarding benefit on clinical front.   
  • Transdermal patches, gels, and intramuscular preparations of bioidentical testosterone are available and FDA approved for use in men with hypogonadism, but no FDA approved testosterone preparation for women.
  • There are currently no FDA approved preparations available for dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), no indication for prescribing it except in few patients with low libido. The bioidentical preparations come with all the drawbacks of dosing, absorption and safety as estrogen and progesterone.
  • Vaginal formulation is currently undergoing trial for vaginal atrophy, but no FDA approved preparation is available in the market.
  • Levothyroxine (LT4) is bioidentical, and is a highly effective therapy in patients with hypothyroidism. It is converted to T3 at tissue level and acts on all the target receptors in the body. Some patients may still exhibit symptoms of hypothyroidism; inspite adequate dosing and the clinician should investigate them for other causes. Compounded hormone therapy can be used in such patients with close monitoring of TSH and free T4.
The statement was published online April 1, 2016 in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.


References:


Friday, April 8, 2016

Debate escalates over morcellation of uterine and fibroid specimens in Minimal Invasive Surgeries after FDA permits the marketing of PneumoLiner!



According to a press release today the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permitted the marketing of the first tissue containment system for use with certain laparoscopic power morcellators to isolate uterine tissue that is not suspected to contain cancer.

"PneumoLiner is intended to contain morcellated tissue in the very limited patient population for whom power morcellation may be an appropriate therapeutic option - and only if patients have been appropriately informed of the risks," FDA deputy director William Maisel said in a news release.

"This new device does not change our position on the risks associated with power morcellation. We are continuing to warn against the use of power morcellators for the vast majority of women undergoing removal of the uterus or uterine fibroids," Dr Maisel added

The recently approved container bag, PneumoLiner  encase the morcellator, inside the abdominal cavity enabling collection and removal of all the morcellated tissue.But, FDA requires the manufacturer to warn patients about the potential risk of spreading unsuspected cancerous tissue.

The labeling for PneumoLiner will include a prominent warning that "the use of this containment system has not been clinically demonstrated to reduce the risk" of spreading an unsuspected uterine cancer.

In April 2014, FDA issued a warning against the use of power morcellators concluding that "a risk of spreading unsuspected cancerous tissue, notably uterine sarcomas." A review of medical literature has shown that unintentional spread of cancer cells occurs in one of every 350 procedures involving power morcellation. Till now, there exists no reliable means to determine preoperatively whether the women with fibroid have uterine sarcoma.

This warning came in the wake of campaign launched in late 2013 by anesthesiologist Amy Reed and her husband, cardiac surgeon Hooman Noorchashm, began campaigning to ban electric morcellators. Reed's undetected sarcoma was spread by the device during a hysterectomy at Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston. A subsequent operation confirmed that morcellation and its tissue-scattering action had advanced the cancer to stage IV, Dr Noorchashm said.

The morcellators were introduced in 1993, but the whole procedure is under heightened scrutiny regarding patient selection and pre-operative investigation in light of recent warnings against power morcellation issued by the US FDA. In the last year alone US FDA has received dozens of complaints about seeding of cancers due to power morcellation

It is estimated that 600,000 women will undergo myomectomy or hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroid in the year 2016; the most common indication being uterine fibroid amounting to 40% of all surgeries.  During the last 10 years, abdominal hysterectomies are increasingly being replaced by minimally invasive hysterectomies that use power morcellators routinely. About 50% of hysterectomies are performed laproscopically.  However, based on demographic research, about one woman will be diagnosed with Uterne Leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) out of every 500-1000 who undergo hysterectomy or myomectomy for a uterine mass.
In the meantime, FDA offered four recommendations to healthcare professionals about information on laparoscopic power morcellators:
  • The agency discourages use of the devices during treatment for uterine fibroids.
  • Do not use laparoscopic power morcellators in women with suspected or known uterine cancer.
  • Consider all treatment options available for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
  • Discuss with patients the risks and benefits of all treatments.
In response to the FDA advisory, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a statement noting that the organization is conducting its own review of the evidence on power morcellation and the risk of spreading cancer. In 2016 ACOG issued a statement advocating development of technology and training for surgeons, and urging the FDA to establish national prospective morcellation surgery registry to establish a large data base.

Many researchers advocate the use of bagged morcellators; however, power morcellation performed within a bag is not well studied and has several limitations that potentially increase the risk of the procedure. Others advocated open surgeries in patients that are at increased risk for leiomyosarcoma, namely increasing age, long-term tamoxifen use, and pelvic radiation.

Meanwhile a recent study published in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology  in March, 2016 aimed to estimate the incidence of occult uterine sarcoma and leiomyosarcoma in hysterectomies for leiomyomas and the risk associated with their morcellation.

Out of 34,728 hysterectomies performed for leiomyomas, 125 specimens were identified as uterine sarcomas. The incidence of occult uterine sarcoma and leiomyosarcoma was 1 of 278 surgeries. The risk of death at 1 year increased for power and no power morcellation as compared to no morcellation.

The study concluded that women with occult leiomyosarcoma have decreased 1 year survival, but lacked power to establish the risk of power morcellation.

Two other recent reviews also advocated that spread of malignancy is a real risk following the tissue morcellation, but also admitted the paucity of enough data to draw a firm conclusion.

Many hospitals and healthcare systems in US have revised the guidelines regarding the informed consent for morcellation procedure so that patients can have more choices and information. All options have to put on table and  patients deserve full disclosure about the treatment.


References:







Tuesday, April 5, 2016

The NCCN add new inherited genetic mutations that are linked to ovarian and breast cancer.




The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has implicated several additional mutations when planning risk management strategies in patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. These mutations confer a risk of either or both cancers with relatively high penetrance.

Dr. Tuya Pal  MD, from the Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida said “ the recent discovery that the genetic mutation PALB2 is associated with an aggressive form of breast cancer, as well as the realization that the newer ovarian cancer genes RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 pose an added lifetime risk for ovarian cancer, should prompt physicians to discuss possible prophylactic procedures with patients who are found to carry these mutations” at 21st Annual National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) conference in Hollywood, FL.

It is known that women who have BRCA1 carriers have a 55 to 65 percent chance of developing breast cancer and 35 to 70 % chance of developing ovarian by age 70 and the corresponding numbers for BRCA2 carriers are 45% and 10-30% respectively. Women with Lynch syndrome have around 10% chance of developing ovarian cancer. The researchers at the conferences implicated additional mutation BARD1, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D and PALB2 with similar level of evidence as BRCA1/2 for ovarian cancer.

Together with established Ovarian Cancer (OC) genes, this addition bring the total number of genes suspected to cause hereditary OC to 11.

Till now, the NCCN was advising or recommending risk reduction surgery of salpingo-oophorectomy as a part of preventive strategy in BRCA1/2 mutation carrier. According to National Cancer Institute( NCI) the lifetime risks of ovarian cancer are 5.2% in RAD51C mutation carriers, 5.8% in BRIP1 mutation carriers, and 12% in RAD51D mutation carriers; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) may be considered for these patients upon completion of childbearing. 

Genes such as CHEK2 and ATM are associated with a 20% or higher lifetime risk of breast cancer; similarly, genes such as RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 are associated with a 5% to 10% risk of ovarian cancer; many of these genes are now included on multi-gene panels, although the clinical actionability of these findings remains uncertain and under investigation.

Screening for these genes is specifically important in regards to Ovarian cancer as there are no screening test and diagnostic modalities at present to catch the disease at an early stage.

A family history should always be taken into account and with strong family history; prophylactic risk management in the form of oophorectomy should be considered.

PALB2 is also an important genetic mutation added to the list along with PTEN, and PT53 that causes the Breast cancer. Women with an abnormal PALB2 gene have a 14% risk of developing breast cancer by age 50 and a 35% risk of developing breast cancer by age 70. It is also seen that cancers developing in patients with the genetic mutation PALB2   are very aggressive and in a polish study  survival for women with breast cancer and a PALB2 mutation was 48·0% compared with 74·7% for patients without a mutation.

So, genetic testing at this point of time has become an important part of cancer management, because if we are proactive we can diagnose the cancer at very early stage or prevent it altogether if we know our risk for them.

Much progress has been made in the field of genetic testing with increased use of multi-gene testing. Genetic testing allow the patients to make an informed decision, about there course of treatment, prognosis and any other cancer risks due to genetic mutation.

The updated NCCN Guidelines for Women with Mutations in PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D

1) Breast Cancer Screening:
Annual MRI beginning at age 30 or earlier, based on family breast cancer history for women with mutations in following genes: ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2

2) Breast Cancer Risk Management
Discussing the option of risk-reducing mastectomy for women with mutations in: PALB2

3) Ovarian Cancer Risk Management
Women with mutations in following genes should consider risk-reducing removal of ovaries and fallopian tubes: BRIP1, RAD51C and RAD51D.

References:
Contribution of Germline Mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D Genes to Ovarian Cancer in the Population JCO (2015) 33 (26): 2901-2907